Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19587

Commentaire fait au nom

Township of Amaranth

Statut du commentaire

January 18, 2019 The Honourable Todd Smith Minister of Economic Development, Job Creation and Trade Queen’s Park – Room 223 Toronto ON M7A 1A2 RE: Bill 66 – Comments from the Township of Amaranth Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19610

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for reading my comments about the proposed “Open for Business” Planning Act changes. As a resident of the City of Hamilton, I share City staff’s concerns with the proposed amendments as follows: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19617

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed changes to the Planning Act are ludicrous. Business [or economics in its wider context] is a false context for society nor should it be given priority by any government. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19620

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Schedule 10 presents some alarm bells for me. The ability to override existing provincial legislation and local planning bylaws that protect our water and environment creates a great cause for concern. Those legislation and by-laws are there for a reason. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19672

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

My name is Emily Germain and I grew up in the Greenbelt. During Mr. Ford’s election campaign, I heard that he was planning on opening the Greenbelt for development, and decided not to vote for the Conservatives. When I heard Mr. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19678

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We are not in favour of any part of Bill 66. As a former retail Pharmacist, I favour reducing bureaucracy, taxes and making guidelines more efficient and less costly, but, these issues need to be addressed specifically and not in an omnibus bill. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19694

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly disagree with the proposed changes in Bill 66. Areas area already been or being dedicated to employment lands with consideration to transportation, employment, environment, etc. through extensive planning and public consultation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19735

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Nature

Statut du commentaire

Ken Petersen Manager Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing Local Government and Planning Policy Division Provincial Planning Policy Branch 777 Bay Street Floor 13 Toronto ON M5G 2E5 Dear Mr. Petersen, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19760

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am deeply concerned about this bill. There seems to be a lot that this is going to effect in to small a package. It actually effects 12 ministries. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19784

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

By eliminating the Toxics Reduction Act and allowing for development under Schedule 10 of Bill 66 that ignores important environmental measures, these proposals eliminate the regulations that are meant to protect the very people whom these government claims to be “for”. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19806

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Do not endanger regulations and laws protecting Ontario's natural areas, farmlands, drinking water and our protection from toxic chemicals. There is no business development that could possibly justify putting any of these systems at risk. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19874

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Open for Business planning tool is not necessary in order to allow business to flourish in our province. We already have a strong economy, and placing the business interests and sprawling residential development. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19880

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I wish to object to the current formulation of Bill 66 regarding section 10, both for what I view as its general effect of using omnibus legislation to enable the effective repeal of selected current legislation which currently helps protect the interest of common people, in favour of development in Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19890

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly disagree with this new legislative proposal which is perceived to be passed without proper public consultation, especially from the environmental experts. It could have a significant impact to the environment of Ontario under the disguise of economic development .