Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16885

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The land use protections and Green Belt are worth protecting, please Protect our Greenbelt lands in Ancaster, Copetown and Hamilton.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16981

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Greenbelt is home to farmland, forests, watersheds and wetlands. It sustains life and is one of the largest greenbelts in the world, which should be a source of pride to us all. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16986

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66 goes way too far by rendering impotent the protections of our laws for our water sources, farm land, natural heritage systems, and our Great Lakes all for the alleged intent of cutting red tape . Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17012

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This act is short sighted and damaging to communities. The environmental risk it entails is beneficial only in the very term and is therefore selfish to future generations. I strongly feel it should be abandoned.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17047

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Allowing development in those areas of the province that (eg. Oak Ridges Morraine) will have a negative impact on ground water resources that support our urban areas and natural spaces. Development will increase storm run-off thereby reducing the water filtering into ground water. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17113

Commentaire fait au nom

Toronto and Region Conservation Authority

Statut du commentaire

January 7, 2019 BY E-MAIL ONLY (ken.petersen@ontario.ca) Mr. Ken Petersen Provincial Planning Policy Branch Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing 777 Bay St., 13th Floor Toronto, ON M5G 2E5 Dear Mr. Petersen: Re: Response to Request for Comments Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17131

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

January 20, 2019 ERO Number 013-4293: BILL 66, RESTORING ONTARIO’S COMPETITIVENESS ACT, 2018 ERO Number 013-4125: PROPOSED OPEN-FOR-BUSINESS PLANNING TOOL ERO Number 013-4239: NEW REGULATION UNDER THE PLANNING ACT FOR OPEN-FOR-BUSINESS PLANNING TOOL Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17143

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am not comfortable with a regulation that will allow municipalities to by-pass protections for open and significant environmental features, including, but not limited to the Green Belt, Niagara Escarpment and Oak Ridges Moraine. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17155

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is inconceivable that a government that committed to protecting the Greenbelt is now putting it and all other natural and environmentally significant spaces at risk simply to attract polluters to our province. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17176

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66 Schedule 10 is an attempt to reduce government barriers to development by turning back the clock on bureaucracy. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17178

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hi, Re Bill 66, Restoring Ontario's Competitiveness Act I don't think exempting businesses from municipal and provincial bylaws is appropriate. Why should larger businesses be exempt and not me. I'm a tax payer and Canadian citizens and should have similar rights.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17187

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Delete entirely the use of schedule 10 as a tool for promoting business opportunities . Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17199

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am not happy about this decision. I think that Ontario is already badly enough laid out in terms of protecting the environment for the people. Please keep the green belt as is, or strengthen it further to allow greenspace accessibility for those of us stuck in the city.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17200

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hundreds of families depend on this as their clean water source in the Hamilton and Halton Regions. I know there are people who drive out from Toronto. I myself drive 40 minutes each way out from Smithville to bottle water here every week. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17209

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The contemplated policy appears to be a blatant attempt to circumvent numerous environmental protections under the guise of "being open for business." This is not what the government was elected to do.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17223

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I think this is a bad idea. I am really worried this Act will be used to build on green space, destroy the remain green belt areas. 20 days for government intervention is not enough at all too. Please reconsider!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17224

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Province of Ontario’s proposed Bill 66 allows for provincial intervention to remove or weaken protections on safe drinking water, agricultural lands, and democratic consultation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17237

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please delete Schedule 10 from Bill 66. It undermines all of our environmental legislation such as the Lake Simcoe Protection Act, Clean Water Act, Greenbelt Act, Protective policies in the Growth Plan and the Oak Ridges Moraine Act, just to name a few. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17241

Commentaire fait au nom

Corporation of the Township of Mulmur

Statut du commentaire

Please find the attached motion regarding Bill 66 passed by Mulmur Township Council on January 09, 2019. Lire davantage