Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31548

Commentaire fait au nom

Mississippi Valley Conservation Authority, Board of Directors

Statut du commentaire

The Board of Directors for the Mississippi Valley Conservation Authority recommend that Schedule 2 not be removed from Bill 108 and deferred for further consideration for the following reasons: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31551

Commentaire fait au nom

Mississippi Valley Conservation Authority

Statut du commentaire

The attached letter was submitted earlier today. It was found to have been scanned incorrectly. Please see earlier submission comments. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31560

Commentaire fait au nom

The Township of Wilmot

Statut du commentaire

Please find attached, Township of Wilmot Council Report, outlining the comments regarding Bill 108. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31566

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I would like to voice my comment about Bill 108, especially on the proposal of having a LPAT. This is the same as OMB which is disbanded for a very good resson. I am strongly opposed bringing the process back. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31567

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a step backwards for Toronto being able to manage it's growth. The city has a planning process that aims to balance new residential construction and increased density with ensuring that the necessary infrastructure is available to support its residents. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31570

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 180 is putting developers before people. Why is the provincial government changing its motto to "For the Developers". Doug Ford promised to be "For the People".

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31574

Commentaire fait au nom

Federation of North Torotno Residents Associatiosn

Statut du commentaire

Preliminary Comments on Bill 108: More Homes, More Choice Act 1. Significantly reduces opportunities for public input in planning - more decision-making at LPAT which ignores Council's decisions where residents had a voice Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31577

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am not pleased with many aspects of the amendments to the Planning Act and feel what is being planned unduly advantages developers at the expense of community needs. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31588

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly disagree with what the Ontario government is proposing in Bill 108. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31590

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Government of Ontario's proposed drastic overhaul of Ontario’s Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA) through changes put forward in Schedule 5 of Bill 108, an omnibus bill tabled on May 2, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31593

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I agree with returning to an OMB type of system and abolishing the LPAT system. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31597

Commentaire fait au nom

The Summit Condominiums Toronto Residents Board of Directors

Statut du commentaire

The current LPAT system was set up after months of public meetings and consultations with many experts. It is meant to balance the needs of developers and the needs of communities. Bill 108 reverses this democratic process, and is less ‘for the people’ and more ‘for the developers’. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31598

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I heartily concur with the City of Toronto's nigh-unanimous opposition to Bill 108; and, to the City's issues, concerns, and suggestions regarding Bill 108.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31601

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Friends of Muskoka (FOM) has serious concerns with proposed Bill 108, as detailed in our attached letter dated May 29, 2019. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31605

Commentaire fait au nom

County of Grey

Statut du commentaire

Please accept the attached document as Grey County's comments regarding Bill 108. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Best regards, Randy Scherzer Director of Planning County of Grey Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31608

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am adamantly opposed to the provisions in Bill 108 that would reinstate the Ontario Municipal Board. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31611

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

These sweeping changes to the Planning Act do not appear to reflect good planning principles, but rather serve to benefit developers only. As a professional planner I am very concerned at the government's disregard for the impact of these changes. Lire davantage