Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

32109

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Hi Sanjay, Given that a 17 days extension for comments has been granted by the Ministry, the City of Oshawa would like to add some more comments below to our response submitted to you on May 29, 2019 for your consideration: Subsection 1(1), Page 4 Read more

Comment ID

32115

Commenting on behalf of

Kawartha Conservation

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
1. Directly reference Section 28 Regulations made under the Conservation Authorities Act, as a site specific instrument in the rules document in order to clearly address the connection between excess soil and natural hazards from flooding and erosion and the need to ensure source water protection. Read more

Comment ID

32149

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Although it may seem expedient to reduce red tape in certain circumstances, I have major reservations when reading the wording used to possibly expedite housing growth. This is especially evident in the section on the reuse of Brown Fields. Read more

Comment ID

32169

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Waste Connections of Canada Response to Excess soil regulatory proposal and amendments to Record of Site Condition (Brownfields) Regulation Ministry of the Environment, Parks and Conservation ERO Number: 013-5000 Introduction Read more

Comment ID

32173

Commenting on behalf of

Walker Industries Holdings Limited

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Good Morning, Please accept the attached comments for #013-5000 Excess Soil Regulatory Proposal and Amendments to Record of Site Condition (Brownfields) Regulation on behalf of Walker Industries. Regards, Bobbie Read more

Comment ID

32186

Commenting on behalf of

Wood Group

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
1. Is there any type of exemption for organic soils or topsoil, including, characterization frequency requirements. 2. Can "liquid soils" be drained actively or through amendments provided that they are eventually transported to an MECP approved facility as "waste?" Read more

Comment ID

32188

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The draft regulations should include a transition clause. As many construction projects that generate excess soil are multi-year projects there should be a mechanism to avoid application of the requirements of this regulation for those projects that are already underway when it is filed. Read more

Comment ID

32189

Commenting on behalf of

Regional Municipality of Niagara (Niagara Region)

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Niagara Region would like to thank the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) for the opportunity to comment on the proposed changes and amendments to the regulations regarding the management of excess soil and record of site conditions for brownfield redevelopment posted on the Read more

Comment ID

32191

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
June 14, 2019 Email to: sanjay.coelho@ontario.ca & ebrfeedback@ontario.ca Sanjay Coelho Environmental Policy Branch 40 St Clair Avenue West, Floor 10 Toronto, ON M4V1M2 ATTENTION: Sanjay Coelho Read more

Comment ID

32192

Commenting on behalf of

City of Guelph

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Refer to attached pdf document for the City of Guelph’s comments on Excess Soil Regulatory Proposal and Amendments to Record of Site Condition (Brownfields) Regulation (ERO Number 013-5000). Read more

Comment ID

32378

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I would like to commend the MOECP for moving to remove the RSC requirement from indoor places of worship migrating to residential zoning. As the owner of a prior church yard, I am predictably somewhat biased, however I do believe it is the right decision. Thanks!

Comment ID

32406

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
3. Temporary Soil Storage Sites: For the purposes of paragraph 10 of subsection 17 (1) of the regulation, the project leader or public body who owns the property on which the temporary soil storage site is located shall ensure that the following requirements are met: Read more