Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

30727

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bill 108 changes o the Ontario Heritage Act would take away local communities' right to say what is important to them, what parts of the past the community values and wishes to pass on to future generations. Read more

Comment ID

30859

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I protest Bill 108. I am horrified to think of a return to the OMB. This bill is not about streamlining changes to the planning process. It is about gutting the GTA and permitting rampant uncontrolled development, all for the benefit of developers. Read more

Comment ID

30862

Commenting on behalf of

Municipality of Dutton Dunwich

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Dutton Dutton Heritage Committee supports the proposed amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act for the following reasons: - local challenges with heritage landscape will be improved - a tool kit will be helpful - support notice of the listing Read more

Comment ID

30880

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We are greatly concerned by the proposed changes to the Ontario Heritage Act. The changes undermine community planning and control and give authority to an unelected body (LPAT) with no heritage expertise. None of this is consistent with "conservative" values. Read more

Comment ID

30911

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I care deeply for our heritage buildings. I am not pleased with this bill which appears to weaken the voice of local communities and Council, and empower developers. Unless I am persuaded otherwise, with proper consultation on this legislation, I will oppose it. Read more

Comment ID

31027

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There appears to be nothing which requires a municipality to undertake a determination of the value of the property/structure from a cultural point of view. It appears to be primarily a series of steps which are necessary SHOULD a municipality WISH to designate a structure. Read more

Comment ID

31355

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Conservation Review Board performs a very useful function in acting as court of last resort for both preservationist and the demolition industry. In the past many heritage resources were demolished in a forlorn hope in an appeal to cabinet. Read more

Comment ID

31432

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The appeals process should be less costly. So someone who is an individual homeowner than a large builder could also financially afford to appeal unfair decisions made by the city staff. Read more

Comment ID

31459

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am vehemently opposed to the proposed changes to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act, 2017. Elected Local councils are the in the best position to determine what is the best use of land and zoning in their communities. Read more

Comment ID

31482

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Decisions pertinent to heritage designation and related planning should be left to the municipal heritage committees. They have the expertise to make these decisions and provide guidelines. Heritage and its preservation of our history and community are imperative. Read more

Comment ID

31500

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Heritage designations are key to democracy; when citizens wish to protect the character of their neighbourhoods, and city planners decide those are in the general interest, the province should support those designations, certainly not undermine them. Read more

Comment ID

31515

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bill 108 should not be passed. The changes to the Ontario Heritage Act will substantially weaken a municipality's ability to protect historic buildings for properties. This should not be a Provincial decision.