Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

35983

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Would recommend the use of caution when considering an Administrative Authority for delivering services related to Code enforcement and compliance. For example, the latest Authorized Nominating Authority selected by MAG under the Construction Act has failed to impress to date. Read more

Comment ID

36024

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Ensuring public safety is the role of the licensed ARCHITECT, or, licensed TECHNOLOGIST, not some high school grad with a BCIN who holds no certificate of practice, has no civil liability and is uninsurable. This is a blatant attempt to have DOUGGIE and his useless gouv. Read more

Comment ID

36074

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
When trying to solve a problem , look at the root cause. The objective is to fast track permit process. Where are the delays? Applicable laws are the root cause of the problem . An administrative authority (AA) cannot bypass applicable law. So obviously AA cannot be a solution Read more

Comment ID

36085

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The following comments are being submitted on behalf of the Council of the Municipality of Oliver Paipoonge with respect to the proposed changes to the Ontario Building Code Act. Council’s comments are as follows: Getting People Working in the Building Sector Read more

Comment ID

36212

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
On first reading, I find the various proposals either uninformed regarding the skills that are available in the building industry, or uninformed regarding the qualification and enforcement systems that already exist and that have been by and large functional. Read more

Comment ID

36220

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on transforming and modernizing the delivery of Ontario’s building code services. I am an architect in the Province of Ontario. The following comments are based on my experience and personal opinion. Read more

Comment ID

36224

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It is a bad joke of the century -A Certified Professional specialist designation will also be implemented, requiring members to participate in a 12-day training program, pass two eight-hour exams and be “accepted by the municipality as a qualified Certified Professional.” Certified Professionals wil Read more

Comment ID

36225

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Council of the Corporation of the Town of Midland considered the above-noted Discussion Paper together with Staff Report PL-2019-91 and authorized and directed staff to submit comments to the Province in keeping with the approved staff report. Read more

Comment ID

36228

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Examination Development and Delivery: Q: How could the current examination design and/or delivery be improved? A: Examination questions should be reviewed to ensure they are clear and people writing the exams understand the questions. Questions that trick people need to be removed. Read more

Comment ID

36230

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As the chair of the Northern Ontario Society of Architects, through the Ontario Association of Architects and a practicing architect in Sudbury, I am in complete disagreement with these poorly planned proposed changes that do not take the work and liability of architects into consideration. Read more

Comment ID

36318

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Examination Development and Delivery - I think the existing structure is an improvement from when there was no mandated qualifications. I agree that the number of questions/time should be re-evaluated based on the portion of the code that they cover. Read more

Comment ID

36352

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
If the wish is for more transparency, efficiency, and streamlining of the process, introducing yet another administrative body into the Building Code review and implementation process is a serious mistake. Read more