Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

15989

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
If culls have already occurred on protected sites (Pelee was noted), then the lands held in the broad public interest are being managed. Without research to prove that these aquatic birds are harming the broader ecosystem, no hunting season should be put in place. Read more

Comment ID

15993

Commenting on behalf of

North Pigeon Lake Association

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Wildlife Section Public Input Coordinator Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Policy Division, Species Conservation Policy Branch December 31, 2018 Re: ERO 013-4124: Proposal to establish a hunting season for Double-crested Cormorants in Ontario Read more

Comment ID

15994

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am in favour of allowing cormorant to be hunted as game birds but do not agree with aspects. The proposed bag limit of 50 cormorant without a possession limit is grossly excessive. Also, the provincial open season of March to Dec 31 is much too long. Read more

Comment ID

15997

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I can’t believe the shortsightedness of this idea! I thought this kind of thinking was abandoned in Canada a long time ago. If fish stocks are truly being depleted, put more restrictions on sport fishing. Our wildlife lives WITH us, not FOR us.

Comment ID

15998

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I have read scientific evidentiary data that stipulates culling the Double-crested Cormorant will NOT be beneficial to the environment. As a lay-person if I know this fact why don't you? To what end are you even thinking exists with this preposterous recommendation. Read more

Comment ID

16001

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The idea of hunting 50 cormorants at a time is preposterous. The animals are likely in the area due to habitat disruptions or climate disruptions elsewhere. and killing them where they seek refuge may cause Read more

Comment ID

16004

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
What is the scientific evidence that a cull is required? What is the scientific basis for having an open hunt province wide? Where does the number of 50 birds a day come from? Why change policy to allow for spoilage? Read more

Comment ID

16007

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I would agree to see something like this happening, the number of up to fifty birds i wouldn't agree with the number should be lower. I'm a life long angler and over the years the number of cormorants has definitely grown steadily over the last decade or so you always see one somewhere it seems. Read more

Comment ID

16008

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am not against hunting. But I am against hunting cormorants. They are inedible and their impact is insignificant compared to ours. I cannot see the logic of the proposal to hunt cormorants during the spring, summer, and autumn with a daily quota per person of 50. Read more