Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

17525

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This comment is to express strong disagreement with the proposed Bill 66. The proposed legislation would reverse protections of the environment, viewscapes and rights of community members in areas where a so-called "Open for Business" By-Law may be passed by a municipality. Read more

Comment ID

17535

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am a senior in my mid-70’s and have been a self-employed tax payer for over 55 years. I want to see workers treated justly and with a living wage and adequate affordable housing. Economic development should not benefit the few, but should protect the vulnerable and the disadvantaged. Read more

Comment ID

17536

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I do not support Bill 66. I do not support Schedule 5 and Schedule 10 under this Bill. It is undemocratic and lacks transparency. It would leave citizens without recourse. Community members would not be able to appeal open-for-business by-laws to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal. Read more

Comment ID

17542

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I do not support Bill 66. I do not support Schedule 5 and Schedule 10 under this Bill. It is undemocratic and lacks transparency. It would leave citizens without recourse. Community members would not be able to appeal open-for-business by-laws to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal. Read more

Comment ID

17554

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I strongly disagree with the proposed changes in Bill 66. Areas area already been or being dedicated to employment lands with consideration to transportation, employment, environment, etc. through extensive planning and public consultation. Read more

Comment ID

17556

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am opposed to Schedule 10 of Bill 66 and urge that it be immediately abandoned or withdrawn by the Ontario government, because I agree with the conclusions in the December 17, 2018 briefing notes on Bill 66 made by the Canadian Environmental Law Association as quoted here: Read more

Comment ID

17557

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am writing to you to ask that you keep your promise to protect the Greenbelt and therefore call back legislature and introduce a new Bill 66 that stops the attacks on the Greenbelt, Oak Ridges Moraine, Lake Simcoe, Source Water Protection Areas, and other important protected farm and natural areas Read more

Comment ID

17558

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Reject Bill 66!! Open-for-business by-laws would override policies in approved source protection plans intended to protect existing and future sources of municipal drinking water from threats such as landfills, sewage systems and improper handling of fuel, manure and pesticides. Read more

Comment ID

17565

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bill 66 is a step towards the destruction of wetlands, woodlands, habitats and species across Ontario. It is a step towards the destruction of local drinking water management and in turn our public health. It is a step toward the destruction of farm land and the continuation of urban sprawl. Read more

Comment ID

17579

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This bill is shortsighted and self-serving. This does not service the greater good of Ontario and will put many at risk. Drop this farce and move forward with something better thought out. Don’t sacrifice the future for the many for short-term gains to a few. Read more