Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

28839

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Stop killing our planet and our species! It is so much more important than anything else could possibly be! Protection and action must be increased, and this is a step in the wrong direction. I want to be proud to be a Canadian, this is not the way!

Comment ID

28840

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am very concerned that proposed "business first" changes to the Endangered Species Act is totally biased in favour of business and commercial interests. To assume that business will put the needs of the environment ahead of its own economic interests is totally unrealistic. Read more

Comment ID

28842

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Increasing the supply of housing does not need to come about by what amounts to removing protection of endangered species in Ontario as is proposed in Schedule 5 of Bill 108. The government's claim that these changes will improve outcomes for species as risk is simply not true. Read more

Comment ID

28845

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
You must stop this asinine cutting of our environmental legislation. The endangered species act is one of the most important laws we have to ensure we steward our wildlife and to leave our children a better world. Read more

Comment ID

28852

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Below are my comments on the proposed changes to the Endangered Species Act as a result of the 10th Year Review 1. Assessing and listing species at risk - Science-based listing of species at risk by COSSARO and automatic protection of listed species and Read more

Comment ID

28854

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am absolutely against the proposed changes, which seem to amount to a very significant weakening of the legislation. I would ask this government to: - Prioritize the recovery of at-risk species over the demands of developers. - Repeal the industry exemptions under section 55. Read more

Comment ID

28888

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I disagree with just about everything in these proposed changes. - Science-based listing of species at risk nd automatic protection of listed species and their habitats provide certainty, whereas ministerial discretion politicizes the process, inviting delay and controversy. Read more

Comment ID

28890

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This review is highly disturbing. It is very clear that the proposed changes are to benefit industries and not Species at Risk. These changes will turn, what is considered a highly respectable Endangered Species Act (on international scales), into a fund for slaying our most vulnerable species. Read more

Comment ID

28892

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
1A. By extending the time when when a COSSARO report is received by the Minister to when listing is to occur from three to twelve months you provide opportunity for the act to be exploited. Within those twelve months development could occur rapidly causing irreparable damage to the listed species. Read more