Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

77899

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I strongly oppose the proposed removal of lands from the Greenbelt. We should meet our housing goals by maximizing density in existing urban and suburban settlements, where city services already exist and can be expanded upon. Read more

Comment ID

77914

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I do not agree with ANY of the following options for changing the area of the Greenbelt I do not agree with removing lands from the Greenbelt Area that could be suitable for residential development in the near term Read more

Comment ID

77932

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I have read these proposals carefully. Removing lands from the Greenbelt that are part of a watershed region, important habitat for diverse species, form corridors for movement of wildlife, cannot be replaced even by adding other lands elsewhere. It's not a question of the number of acres involved. Read more

Comment ID

77941

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The land on Garner Rd W (Map 9) is already in a busy, developed area with multiple condos and townhomes directly across the road. There are multiple retail stores just down the road. This land previously was not part of the greenbelt but was put in a few years back. Read more

Comment ID

77954

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The decision to remove protections for the Greenbelt is a reckless and dangerous one that does nothing to improve housing affordability within the province. It completely goes against what the people of Ontario want and creates a more unliveable environment. Read more

Comment ID

77983

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I oppose bill 23 and any development of farmland ,forests and conservation lands . Our civilizations is reliant on the very systems we insist on compromising and destroying.Why an intelligent species would actively particapate in its its own extiction boggles my mind. Read more

Comment ID

78004

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Once it is gone, it's gone! I highly doubt that once you realize what a mistake you have made Mr ford, that you will tear up everything that you paved over because of the increase in flooding. Also why would allow this to happen with all the food insecurity that is happening right now? Read more

Comment ID

78006

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Premier promised not to touch the greenbelt. This is a dangerous, careless and unrepairable environmentally destructive decision that will be remembered for years into the future as a horrible mistake if it is allowed to proceed. Read more

Comment ID

78011

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This bill is one of the most short-sighted bills ever enacted. It is long term pain for our children, grandchildren and generations beyond for the enrichment of a very few. We will need all the arable land and greenspace Ontario can get. Read more