Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

120831

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Spending billions of dollars to bring more into Toronto is pointless because there is still nowhere for them to drive when they get there. There's a finite amount of road because... there are already buildings there. Read more

Comment ID

120853

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Hello as a permanent resident for the last year of Canada, working in the advertising technologies industry, one of the great draws of Toronto was its versioning cycling culture. This great city design was one of the things that drew me to move to Canada from the United States. Read more

Comment ID

120859

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am a regular cyclist in the city of Toronto, who is saddened and concerned by the proposal to remove bike lanes. This is a poor use of provincial funding, an irresponsible decision for environmental sustainability, and will make cycling in the city more dangerous. Read more

Comment ID

120861

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
On Bike lanes, this bill represents inappropriate provincial overreach into municipal matters. It goes against research findings about the actual causes of gridlock, and will waste millions of dollars to buy votes premised on anti-urban sentiment. Read more

Comment ID

120890

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Canadians don't need more infrastructure for personal automobiles. What they do need is more alternatives to get people out of cars so that traffic congestion can be eased. Bike lanes are necessary urban infrastructure and are good for the local economy. Read more

Comment ID

120906

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I do NOT support this bill in any way, shape , or form. It is an egregious waste of taxpayer money that will end in an increase in bicycle deaths and accidents. Additionally, the gridlock that the deconstruction of the lanes would cause would only increase traffic and congestion downtown. Read more

Comment ID

120953

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am strongly opposed to Bill 212. As a daily cyclist and a Toronto resident, I rely on bike lanes to commute safely and efficiently. By choosing to cycle, I’m helping reduce congestion and pollution, making the city more livable for everyone. Read more

Comment ID

120980

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As a downtown resident and cyclist, the proposal will not improve traffic. The issue with traffic is construction, illegal parking or turns, and many ride share cars. I am opposed because as a cyclist, I will now take the lane, as I am entitled to. Otherwise, I risk aggressive drivers. Read more

Comment ID

120997

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is an irresponsible Bill that will not improve gridlock across Ontario, especially in Toronto. Our over reliance on cars, and designing cities that only work for cars, makes gridlock worse. There is no way out of congestion by planning for more cars. Read more