Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

83633

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Agree with * Housing density around major transit lines - add increased minimum percentage * homes on farmland for workers - add net-zero builds * mandatory mixed housing - add % specifics so that higher density housing has greater proportion Read more

Comment ID

83637

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The following proposals will facilitate unnecessary urban sprawl, further fragment agricultural areas making it more difficult for farmers to operate, and put further pressure on natural areas at a time when we need to be protecting them for carbon sequestration and water resource management purpose Read more

Comment ID

83690

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
What are the provincial enforcement mechanisms to ensure municipalities implement these policies in order to increase the approved land available for housing stock? If there is no enforcement, these provincial goals will not be achieved.

Comment ID

83694

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is a good step forward, curious to see how it affects the eastern Ontario municipalities that tend to see extreme pushback from residents and council members who undermine the housing projects, they make it difficult to develop housing in city centres and adjacent to major transit nodes. Read more

Comment ID

83700

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Appreciate the latest round of changes, what is the province doing to get commenting agencies to also ensure that their comments are supportive of new housing and not just a redundant comment that adds further delays?

Comment ID

83702

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am concerned with the lack of natural heritage portions in the new proposed PPS. Will there be an official release of the natural heritage section? When will this be? Read more

Comment ID

83703

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I appreciate the consideration of updating the Provincial Policy Statement. As the owner of one of the largest development consulting firms (Planning, Architecture and Engineering) in Ontario, we have seen a number of unnecessary development hurdles over the years. A few suggestions: Read more

Comment ID

83714

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Some comments based on the proposed changes to the Plamning Act PPS and GPGGH. "Require municipalities to permit more housing on farms, including residential lot creation subject to criteria, additional residential units and housing for farm workers" Read more

Comment ID

83723

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Aanii/Bonjour: The expansion of a municipal boundary, without the official Consent of any First Nation impacted by such an expansion, is a violation of the Crown's Duty to Consult and is a breach of the Honour of the Crown. Read more

Comment ID

83785

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Firstly, for the sake of all Ontario residents and its future residents, do NOT allow development on the Greenbelt. This is one of the most precious resources we have in all of Canada, which needs to be protected. Read more

Comment ID

83788

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As a farmer, I applaud the proposal to allow additional houses to be built on the farm to support multigenerational families. Housing prices are incredibly high and availability is not abundant. Read more

Comment ID

83791

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This proposal encourages 1950"s sprawl - it is encourages cutting in to our green spaces further impacting the environment, waterways and endangered species. Read more

Comment ID

83814

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As a young male living in Waterloo Region, specifically Elmira, Im happy to see the provincial government is actually doing something to help remedy the obvious housing crisis thats occurring in our region. Read more

Comment ID

83907

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Supportive of the Rural Growth proposed changes. I would suggest a maximum lot creation in the agricultural areas to minimize impacts on farm land. 1 acre lot or the equivalent metric size is sufficient even on Private services. Read more

Comment ID

83911

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Why is natural heritage still under consideration, nearly 6 months after this process was initiated? Will the review and comment period be extended when the natural heritage section is applied? If not, why?

Comment ID

83915

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Absolutely unsupportive of this mess. The Growth Plan is a key land use planning document that has specified density targets that requires intensification, a key tool to impact climate change, improve community scale development and limit urban sprawl. Read more

Comment ID

83941

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Consersative growth plan is not what most citizens want to see. Unfortunately this plan was created without the expectations of citizens taken into account.

Comment ID

83943

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am glad to see the Indigenous inclusion in consideration of land use. Also glad to see the focus on single family housing changed to include diverse and mixed housing. Read more