Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

116715

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The provincial government should leave matters such as bike lanes to the municipalities. This is a clear overreach of power and targets bikers disproportionately, starting by tearing out three bike lanes in critical downtown locations. Read more

Comment ID

116758

Commenting on behalf of

Rural Active Transportation Collaborative (RATC), a working group of the Ontario Society of Physical Activity Promoters in Public Health (OSPAPPH)

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Rural Active Transportation Collaborative (RATC), a working group of the Ontario Society of Physical Activity Promoters in Public Health (OSPAPPH) is writing to express our concern about Bill 212, Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 – Framework for bicycle lanes that require removal of Read more

Comment ID

116794

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This law will waste taxpayer money. Removing existing bike lanes costs more than installing new ones. Removing a lane requires traffic to be shut down for months, causing even more traffic delays. How many roads do you want to have one-way traffic? Read more

Comment ID

116804

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bike lanes are not causing congestion in the City of Toronto. The massive number of drivers in the city are creating the congestion. Larger roads with more lanes do not solve the problem as they will fill up with cars. Read more

Comment ID

116822

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Re: Bradford Bypass, Bill 212 On October 21st your Ministry introduced Bill 212, which includes the Building Highways Faster Act. On October 28th you announced that you have awarded the contract to build the western Read more

Comment ID

116823

Commenting on behalf of

Rescue Lake Simcoe Coalition

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
On October 21st your Ministry introduced Bill 212, which includes the Building Highways Faster Act. On October 28th you announced that you have awarded the contract to build the western portion of the highway between highway 400 and Yonge St. Read more

Comment ID

116824

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I disagree with the bill. Neither removal of bike lanes nor just road widening is the solution, now it in the future. Please build better public transport infrastructure instead, or make working from home a viable option

Comment ID

116867

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
With the new bike lanes on Bloor and , I cycle to work every day. I feel much safer on roads with proper bike lanes. I’ve also noticed that University and Yonge street feel much safer with the new bike lanes. Read more

Comment ID

116873

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
How will clogging up the roads with more single occupant vehicles help businesses? So deliveries will be even more delayed. It will be even harder for them to find a spot to unload. Seriously, who thought this was a good bill.

Comment ID

116967

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I ask that Bill 212 be withdrawn due to its threat to farmland, forests and wetlands which will disappear if it is built. The public has made it very clear to this government that it opposes this expansion of highway infrastructure for many reasons. Read more