Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

118702

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bill 212 seems to be misguided. It claims to deal with traffic gridlock, but the methods it proposes would maintain or increase gridlock. This is supported by studies discussed in recent publications. For example: Read more

Comment ID

118707

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Republic Residents’ Association (www.republicresidents.com) has supported the City of Toronto’s ‘Complete Streets’ policy for all new planned and road reconstruction including recommendations outlined in the Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan, providing “direct and continuous walking and cycling rout Read more

Comment ID

118813

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bill 212 is Undemocratic. We voted for a mayor and a Councillor who pledged support for safe streets in our city. Ripping out downtown bike lanes will make our streets lethal for cyclists. Why is the Provincial government trying to override municipal jurisdiction over our streets? Read more

Comment ID

118939

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
My father suffered a life-altering brain injury in a collision with a vehicle while riding on the streets in Toronto. Bike lane would have prevented the brain injury of a highly qualified Engineer with a PhD. As a Torontonian, This proposed bill is a shame!

Comment ID

118945

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Traffic research consistently shows that simply adding more lanes or highways does not lead to better traffic control. We should be encouraging people to consider alternative modes of transportation. We should be investing more public transportation and promoting use of bikes lanes. Read more

Comment ID

118967

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I strongly believe this is a beaurocratic based decision. Tax payer dollars should be much better spent on healthcare and education. There aren't enough family doctors in Ontario, and even having one doesn't mean you get to actually see them. Read more

Comment ID

118995

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
How is the government aware of how these bike lines are actually impacting traffic? Where is the data? You should let cities follow their well thought out transportation plans. Less bike lines will make it unsafe for people using that mode of transportation, which might lead to accidents. Read more

Comment ID

119058

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am writing to express my opposition to Bill 212. I am disappointed to learn that the provincial government is overreaching its typical bounds and proposing changes to municipal roads, specifically as it relates to removal of bike lanes on Bloor Street, University Avenue and Yonge Street. Read more

Comment ID

119060

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the Ontario government's recent bill that would allow the province to ban and remove bike lanes, and we urge you to vote against this misguided legislation. Read more