Comment
Is this section not wildly open to interpretation?
A provision prohibits registered owners from applying under the Expropriations Act for the adjustment of the date of possession for land that was expropriated by the Minister for the purposes of a priority highway project.
Does this actually remove the opportunity for landowners to request a reassessment of having their property reappropriated? Does this not literally infringe on Bill 190, Property Rights and Responsibilities Act, 2009?
"Under the Expropriations Act, an inquiry officer on an inquiry is required to consider the merits of the objectives of the expropriating authority and to add, as parties to an expropriation inquiry, the owners of all lands affected by the expropriation. The decision of an approving authority is subject to judicial review."
This seems incredibly damaging and not something the public would be comfortable with.
Submitted November 13, 2024 11:13 AM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
115269
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status