Comment
Double crested cormorants do have an impact on the tree and fish populations, but this is part of a natural evolution of a shoreline ecosystem. Cormorants are doing exactly what they are supposed to do in their environment. Therefore, I agree with monitoring and assessing their population and status.
I do not agree with allowing the hunting of cormorants under any circumstances. These birds have been on the decline due to habitat loss, pollution, culls, and most recently, Newcastle disease, which is species specific.
The proposed hunting season between March 15th to December 31st is too long, gives visitors to natural areas no break, and will leave orphaned chicks.
The proposed bag limit of 50 birds per person is excessive.
Allowing any hunted animal to rot is completely unethical. Animals are not garbage. Leaving animals to rot can create attractants and wildlife conflicts.
Any lethal wildlife control leaves more room for more animals. A lethal approach is a lazy approach that does not get to the root of the problem. A much better approach to human conflicts with double crested cormorants is to fully protect them from hunting and culls, while educating the public about their vital role in the environment. No species exists without reason.
Submitted January 3, 2019 10:57 AM
Comment on
Proposal to establish a hunting season for double-crested cormorants in Ontario
ERO number
013-4124
Comment ID
16560
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status