Comment
There are various objectives stated in the review - some are not compatible. In those instances it is imperative that what is controlled is human activity, especially when it comes to 'business propositions/economic development'. This act must exist to "enable positive outcomes for species at risk". Without a healthy environment, nothing goes forward in the long run. In fact we need an orientation that encourages restoration, especially of wetlands, watersheds, and wildlife corridors. . Administrative expediency cannot be a factor - this is new territory in history, our science and awareness is growing. It will take time and education for people to learn to make wise decisions. Indeed that interface with our environment is a good place for job creation.
Submitted February 27, 2019 10:45 AM
Comment on
10th Year Review of Ontario’s Endangered Species Act: Discussion Paper
ERO number
013-4143
Comment ID
22112
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status