Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

15846

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Dear Sir or Madam:I was shocked to hear of the proposed change in the law to make the Double-crested Cormorant a game bird. This is nonsense. Nobody eats them. It is a new attempt to tamper with nature and regulate bird numbers. Read more

Comment ID

15847

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This sounds like someone;s idea of a very sick joke - changing the regulations to allow someone to shoot 50 birds a day for most of the year and throw them in a dumpster. Thanks God I live in BC where there is some respect for the environment and its creatures.

Comment ID

15849

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I oppose this proposal. The overarching reason is the lack of science supporting that there is a problem, and that the theoretical problems that cormorants may pose are not best addressed with this method of population control (thus the stated goal is not supported by the proposal). Read more

Comment ID

15852

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am quite concerned with this proposal. It seems to me the underlying goal of this proposal is to reduce the cormorant numbers in Ontario. Regardless if that is a worthy goal or not, the idea of controlling them having an open hunting season is seriously flawed for a number of reasons. Read more

Comment ID

15855

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am writing to express my concerns about the proposal to list the double-crested cormorant as a game bird whose population will be controlled not on a scientific basis through wise management of its habitat but as one that can be randomly shot throughout its breeding season. Read more

Comment ID

15861

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The "science" behind this proposal has been thoroughly discredited. I can't believe that the Ontario government is going to undo years of conservation for wildlife with this ridiculous proposal. It is mean, cruel, and unnecessary. Read more

Comment ID

15862

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The double-breasted cormorant does fill an important ecological niche in that it feeds primarily on non-native fish species such as alewives. The proposed limits would allow entire colonies to be killed in a single day, which not only sounds cruel but could negatively impact local ecologies. Read more

Comment ID

15864

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I absolutely do not support the hunt of the double crested cormorants. I think it is based off of loose science, immoral standards and in favour of non-native fisheries that provide revenue for the government. Meanwhile this bird is a native species. Read more

Comment ID

15865

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Good idea to thin out the population These birds are so destructive and pose a true threat to fisheries While your at it let's look at doing something about the coyote and wolf populations While we still have some deer and moose left in the province Read more

Comment ID

15867

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
What a ridiculous, dangerous and illegal idea. Shooting allowed on waterways during summer months, endangering lives? So dangerous. Shooting colonies of cormorants and disrupting the nesting of other protected species? Ridiculous and illegal. Read more