Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

16711

Commenting on behalf of

Environment Hamilton

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
*Please publish this comment. It is coming from an organization and we have no problem with the government sharing our input! RE: EBR Registry Number: 013-4124 (Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Proposal to establish a hunting season for double-crested cormorants in Ontario) Read more

Comment ID

16713

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I cannot begin to fathom how you could put "Establish a bag limit of 50 cormorants/day with no possession limit." and "environmental impact expected to be neutral" in the same article. This is wholesale irresponsibility. There are surely better controls available, and I'm certain more humane ones. Read more

Comment ID

16715

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am writing to express concern and opposition to the proposal to establish a hunting season for Double-crested Cormorants in Ontario. My opposition is based on the following: 1. Dubious scientific rationale for the proposal; Read more

Comment ID

16716

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As a fisherman i fully support the hunt proposal. I fish to eat when i go camping and have to work all day to catch my supper these days. Meanwhile flocks if cormorants go flying by me full of game fish. I also dont enjoy picking the worms out of my pan fish. Read more

Comment ID

16717

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am against the Government’s proposal that there be a "hunt" of double-crested cormorants that could easily eradicate this important, ecologically beneficial native waterbird from most of the province. Read more

Comment ID

16718

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I personally believe that this proposal has merit. I do however have a major concern about changing the conservation act to allow meat to spoil. This will potentially set a precedent that will effect other animal species.

Comment ID

16720

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It is utter madness to start hunting these birds and destroy even more wildlife. Stop killing wildlife including seals ! For goodness sake grow up and see get educated that you live in a complex eco system where every species has a purpose except ,humans sadly. Read more

Comment ID

16722

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am a fisherman in the Georgian Bay area and have watched the destruction of the fish stocks by cormorants. I have recently seen them invade Gloucester Pool and their droppings have killed all the vegetation on the small islands they make home. Read more

Comment ID

16728

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Before engaging in "cull the flock" tactics, the Province should review the ecological niche occupied by the cormorants - and understand what results there might be from drastically reducing the population. Read more

Comment ID

16731

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I can’t believe that we as a province are even spending the time and money debating this issue. Cormorants are not a source of food. Cormorants have successfully increased in numbers after DDT almost drive them to extinction. I am not aware of any evidence that they are a food source. Read more