Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

16734

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Cormorants are, like all other bird species, very important in the food web. They are certainly not the source of the problem of low fish stocks....humans are! We need to focus on gathering better research and an understanding of the natural cycles of fish poulations to influence our quotas. Read more

Comment ID

16735

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is a very necessary decision to control the population of cormorants. As a person who has watched over the last 10 years,the cormorants breed unchecked, destroy all vegetation in the areas that they live and feed en masse, I fully support the need to manage their population numbers. Read more

Comment ID

16739

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Dear Sir/ Madame, It is inconceivable that the purposed Cormorant hunt would allow a hunter to kill 50 Cormorants a day and leave their bodies to rot or even worse to die slowly because they have only been wounded. What becomes of the nestlings? This hunt Read more

Comment ID

16742

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please do not allow indiscriminate hunting. Please ensure that research is done. If they are truly a major problem then remove safely and humanely. Humans are destroying our ecological balance by being so self entitled.

Comment ID

16745

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I live on Sunny Lake, Gravenhurst, Ontario for over 20 years. There used to be loon pairs on this lake every summer. Cormorants have pushed them out and now there are no loons anymore. Only cormorants and geese. Read more

Comment ID

16746

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I oppose this hunting proposal because it is scientifically baseless. Allowing hunters to bag 50 Double-crested cormorants a day during a 9 month period could very well eradicate the Great Lakes population which is only estimated to be around 250,000 individuals. Read more

Comment ID

16747

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Proposal: ERO number 013-4124 Dear Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry: I am a Canadian citizen, an Ontario resident, and a taxpayer who is vehemently opposed to the proposal to establish a hunting season for double-crested cormorants in Ontario (ERO number 013-4124). Read more

Comment ID

16748

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bill 205 is just another in the long history of wildlife "management" efforts to eliminate elements of the natural world that become inconvenient to humans, viz. cormorants. They're bothering the rich people in their cottages and raiding their fisheries, messing with their sport fishery. Read more

Comment ID

16750

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am an avid hunter and a “birder” and I find this proposed regulation concerning, ridiculous and I am opposed to opening a hunting season for cormorants the way it is proposed. Below are some of my concerns/reasons. Read more

Comment ID

16752

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
List Cormorants as a game species that can be killed under the authority of a small game licence. Retable Bill 205 to include double-crested cormorants in the list of birds in Clause 5 (2) (a) of the Fish & Wildlife Conservation Act to remove existing protections. Read more

Comment ID

16754

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I disagree with the proposal and think that it should not proceed for the following reasons: 1. The proposal does not include any scientific evidence or justification indicating the need for this new hunting population management tool Read more