Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

19861

Commenting on behalf of

City of Hamilton Public Health Services - Healthy Environments Division

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
January 20, 2019 Provincial Planning Policy Branch c/o Ken Peterson 777 Bay Street 13th Floor Toronto, ON M5G 2E5 Re: Environmental Registry Comments from Healthy Environments Division, City of Hamilton for Bill 66, Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act, 2018 Dear Sir/Madame, Read more

Comment ID

19863

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
In order to remain sustainably competitive with longevity into the future, the province requires better long term, well structured and strong legislation in true matters of future stability, such as environmental health. As a resource-based economy (Randall & Ironside, 1996). Read more

Comment ID

19865

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I would think anyone living in Ontario in fact anyone living should be concerned about the environment not just for themselves but for their families and for future generations. We should at the very least keep strict checks and balances in place not reduce or eliminate them. Read more

Comment ID

19869

Commenting on behalf of

THE PRESERVATION OF AGRICULTURAL LANDS SOCIETY

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The following letter to the Chair of the Regional Municipality of Niagara and Council, reflects the views of The Preservation of Agricultural Lands Society (PALS) on Bill 66 Restoring Ontario's Competitiveness Act 2018 Read more

Comment ID

19871

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please consider the environment and sensitive areas - Greenbelt (Oak Ridges Moraine) as a priority. Preserving our environment is more important in the long term than immediate business improvement and employment considerations. There is far too much development in York Region at this time! Read more

Comment ID

19873

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bill 66 is equal parts foolish and reckless. Instead of continuing to sustainably attract and retain new talent and employment in urban cores, especially Toronto, the province proposes that its 'economic growth' should be driven by land-intensive, sprawl-inducing production-based employment. Read more

Comment ID

19876

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I wish to object to the current formulation of Bill 66, both for what I view as its general effect of using omnibus legislation to enable the effective repeal of selected current legislation which currently helps protect the interest of common people, in favour of development interests, and for the Read more

Comment ID

19881

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am strongly opposed to the proposed legislation included in Bill 66, which would dramatically jeopardize the well-being and health of all Ontario citizens. I understand that the Conservative government is keen to create more economic opportunities with the “open-for-business” planning tool. Read more

Comment ID

19885

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I would like to question the validity of the statement saying several of these agricultural acts are "out of date" are going to be removed as opposed to updated? I fear these changes and cuts will remove protection from the extremely important Canadian environment. Read more

Comment ID

19889

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Conservative plan seems to be going backwards. When so many municipalities/levels of government/agencies/etc. are making great efforts to "be green", why would Ford and company be trying to repeal the current cap and trade? This doesn't seem logical to me. I am firmly against this.