Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

20449

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The significance that the current provincial government is placing on Bill 66 and labeling it ‘Open for Business' is misleading and lacking in real detail. The specifics of what is being proposed are deliberately being withheld. Read more

Comment ID

20452

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The significance that the current provincial government is placing on Bill 66 and labeling it ‘Open for Business' is misleading and lacking in real detail. The specifics of what is being proposed are deliberately being withheld. Read more

Comment ID

20453

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This Bill destroys years of bi-partisan collaborative work with environmental groups and concerned citizens. It is not about competitiveness. There are "employment lands" available in surplus. This is Doug Ford and the Conservative party paying back developers for their funding. Read more

Comment ID

20454

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please reconsider schedule 10...our land, water and air need the protections this provides. Truly consider the costs to our future selves...we as a community only have certain parts of this province that are untainted...why can't we keep it that way, once it's gone, it's gone forever. Read more

Comment ID

20457

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This Bill 66 is leading Ontario in the wrong direction, we want to be more sustainable not repeal on important laws and regulations made to PROTECT people such as the Clean Water Act, that was made because of the Walkerton tragedy, may I remind you. Read more

Comment ID

20459

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Ontario's Greenbelt needs to continue to be protected. It cannot be compromised. Residential and industrial growth is already reducing Ontario's natural land and habitats. There needs to be greater protection for Canada's land, not less. Read more

Comment ID

20462

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I feel that it is wrong to allow the municipalities to do as they want without having to consult the people it affects. Bill 66 can allow changes that can be harmful for our environment. Municipalities should not be able to bypass provincial legislation and allow no appeal process. Read more

Comment ID

20469

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I have concerns that I wish for my Provincial representatives to understand and voice on my behalf, regarding Bill 66. My concerns are regarding the QUALITY that will remain in Ontario with what is referred to as "Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act" as it is currently presented. Read more

Comment ID

20471

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is outrageous. “Removing Red Tape,” basically means making it easier for Doug Ford’s friends to make money by further exploiting the environment, and in this case even children. Just two of the many steps backwards are: -repealing the toxics reduction act Read more

Comment ID

20473

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
From someone who became ill during the Walkerton Water Crisis, along with other family members who continue to suffer lasting kidney and heart damage ... I do not support Bill 66 as it is expressly designed to circumvent environmental protections and the Walkerton legacy created. Read more