Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

29463

Commenting on behalf of

London Development Institute

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The London Development Institute is pleased to provide the attached comment s regarding your proposed changes to the Conservation Authorities Act regulations regarding development permits. Read more

Comment ID

29472

Commenting on behalf of

City of Mississauga

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
1) It is unclear if updating definitions for key regulatory terms, including: “wetland”, “watercourse” and “pollution” would have impact on the development applications received by the municipality Read more

Comment ID

29627

Commenting on behalf of

Town of St. Marys

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Re: ERO Number 013-4992 “Focusing conservation authority development permits on the protection of people and property” These comments are submitted on behalf of the Council of the Town of St. Marys. Read more

Comment ID

29769

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I support increasing the transparency of the conservation authorities funding sources. Board members should have a clear role and act with the public interest in mind, not their own interests. Read more

Comment ID

29809

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Corporation of the County of Bruce brucecounty.on.ca Planning and Development Committee Report To: Warden Mitch Twolan Members of the Planning and Development Committee From: Kara Van Myall Director of Planning and Development Date: May 16, 2019 Read more

Comment ID

29968

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Conservation Authorities should not be allowed to comment on Shore lines. This should be left to the province. They do not have qualified staff. They require peer reviews on engineers reports costing landowners thousands of dollars. They deny applications with no real reasons. Read more

Comment ID

30024

Commenting on behalf of

Lakehead Region Conservation Authority

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Lakehead Region Conservation Authority supports the comments submitted by Conservation Ontario on behalf of all 36 Conservation Authorities and provides the following additional comments. Read more

Comment ID

30035

Commenting on behalf of

Ontario Stone Sand and Gravel Association

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please find enclosed our submission on ERO posting 013-4992. We have also enclosed our submission on ERO posting 013-5018 as it is referenced in our submission. Read more

Comment ID

30081

Commenting on behalf of

Long Point Region Conservation Authority

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Ministry proposals and Long Point Region Conservation Authority’s responses are included below: 1. Update definitions for key regulatory terms to better align with other provincial policy, including: “wetland”, “watercourse” and “pollution”; LPRCA response: Read more

Comment ID

30102

Commenting on behalf of

Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
May 17, 2019 CATARAQUI REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY COMMENTS ON ENVIRONMENTAL REGISTRY POSTING 013-4992: FOCUSING CONSERVATION AUTHORITY DEVELOPMENT PERMITS ON THE PROTECTION OF PEOPLE AND PROPERTY Read more

Comment ID

30164

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Dear Minister Yakabuski, The Township of Augusta has a strong history of close collaboration with South Nation Conservation (SNC) on shared priorities, which protect the environment and engage communities while balancing people and nature. Read more

Comment ID

30166

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Dear Minister Yakabuski, The Township of North Stormont has a strong history of close collaboration with South Nation Conservation (SNC) on shared priorities, which protect the environment and engage communities while balancing people and nature. Read more

Comment ID

30174

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Dear Minister Yakabuski, The Municipality of Casselman has a strong history of close collaboration with South Nation Conservation (SNC) on shared priorities, which protect the environment and engage communities while balancing people and nature. Read more

Comment ID

30180

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Dear Minister Yakabuski, The Township of Edwardsburgh Cardinal has a strong history of close collaboration with South Nation Conservation (SNC) on shared priorities, which protect the environment and engage communities while balancing people and nature. Read more

Comment ID

30187

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Dear Minister Yakabuski, The Nation Municipality has a strong history of close collaboration with South Nation Conservation (SNC) on shared priorities, which protect the environment and engage communities while balancing people and nature. Read more