Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

27604

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We are driving species in our world to go extinct because of our inhumane practices! Do not let Canada get on the same map as others. We need to keep protecting our endangered animals, they cannot survive without our help! Read more

Comment ID

27606

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Creation of Regulatory Charge and Agency and option for payment-in-lieu should be removed. Any option for a payment-in-lieu comprises the entire point of the Endangered Species Act. I do not believe it should be in the proposal.

Comment ID

27607

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
A ridiculous proposal putting huge decision-making power in the hands of a Minister who in all likelihood knows nothing about the environment or the management of our precious wildlife. Smacks of corporate intervention to all but the dullest of Canadians. Read more

Comment ID

27610

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Note: Same information already submitted in the area that does not require registration so our names are removed from this version to allow publication. Rod Phillips Minister of Environment, Conservation, and Parks Read more

Comment ID

27613

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These changes will not help to protect species, please reconsider. It should be harder to build in an area where endangered species are present. Biodiversity is critical to ecosystem functioning and stability, and is valuable. Read more

Comment ID

27616

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
You need to be protecting these species. I oppose your changes and strongly encourage you to reconsider going forward with this plan. The biodiversity of our country is at stake and the proposed changes will surely be detrimental.

Comment ID

27618

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Why would any government “support” economic development over species at risk ? You are just creating more conflict with the populace for ?? And why would more “ decision making “ be given to any government employee ? I thought we were Read more

Comment ID

27621

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I understand some of these proposed amendments. For instance being able to delay the protections (although 3 years seems like a significant delay), while current business owners work to address concerns over newly listed species. Read more

Comment ID

27623

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This proposal gives too much discretionary action to the minister overseeing the protection for species at risk. Protections for these species should not be discretionary as personal biases, prejudice and party politics will come into play. Read more

Comment ID

27643

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Our animals are as important as we are. Stop cutting down trees and killing them. Stop taking from them. Share and preserve and hope to heaven you haven’t ruined it already. You need a lesson on kindness not making money. You can’t eat money and when that’s all that is left, try eating it???? Read more