Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

27315

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The proposed changes are irresponsible and could potentially cause endangered species to go extinct. I am begging you to review your proposal. This world and the animals in it will not survive of we keep destroying it. Not everything should be about money!!!!

Comment ID

27320

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The purpose of acts like the ESA are to protect vulnerable species and landscapes, so that future generations can a) enjoy these spaces and b) they can remain healthy and functioning to provide valuable ecosystem services to society. Read more

Comment ID

27324

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
You have to amend this. Think clearly and consciously about this bill. As stewards of our species at risk, creating a a monetization or having the option to pay fees so that company’s organizations and developers can work around the rules and laws which are in place for reason is outrageous. Read more

Comment ID

27327

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am strongly against this decision. In a world of vanishing species, of increasing climate change, we require firm rules rather than a softening of regulations. Fees sent toward research do not protect the species being damaged by the actions producing said fees. Read more

Comment ID

27328

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I strongly agree with the proposed changes as they provide a more balanced approach to dealing with species in Ontario. The research and funding for specific species will provided a greater ecological investment over replacement. Read more

Comment ID

27333

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Here we are again on this "Open for Business not for the People but for the Corporations" attack on the environment. A disgraceful and blatant attempt to destroy the Endangered Species Act begun by the previous Ontario government. Four proposals are especially outrageous: Read more

Comment ID

27335

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The proposed changes to this Act are very dangerous and would have irreversible negative consequences for Species at Risk in Ontario. The science is clear that these species need more protections, not less. Many of their populations and habitats are still declining despite current protections. Read more

Comment ID

27337

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
After reviewing the comments received by the public, I have concluded that proposed changes to the act do not reflect what people asked for. I agree with the comments of Ontario Nature, Environmental Defence and the David Suzuki Foundation: Read more