Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

32562

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The proposed change to Ontario Regulation 82/98 to remove discounted services, does this include Development Charge Background Study costs as this is a "Discounted Service" ?

Comment ID

32586

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
• Allowing municipalities, the power to prescribe the interest rates for DC deferrals will likely discourage developers from constructing purpose built rental. Read more

Comment ID

32718

Commenting on behalf of

Drewlo Holdings Inc. (Developer & Rental Housing Provider)

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Drewlo Holdings Inc. agrees with the Province's assessment; development charges are a major demand on the cashflow of new development - particularly for cost-sensitive forms of housing such as purpose-built rental. Read more

Comment ID

32802

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please see the below link to the County of Grey's comments on Bill 108: More Homes, More Choices Act, Environmental Registry Posting Numbers 019-0181, 019-0183, and 019-0184 and the Proposed Regulation changes under the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act, 19-MAG007. Read more

Comment ID

32829

Commenting on behalf of

Regional Municipality of Niagara

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
On behalf of the Commissioner of Planning and Development Services of the Regional Municipality of Niagara, attached is Niagara’s comments to Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing “Proposed changes to O. Reg. Read more

Comment ID

32861

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It is hard to understand how the provincial government can be so sympathetic to development charges when they currently cover somewhere between 50% and 80% of development costs. Who pays the remainder? TAXPAYERS, that’s who! Read more

Comment ID

32885

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please allow municipalities to say No to developments that destroy habitat. Please repeal the Ontario Municipal Board. Please do not make it easier for developers to destroy natural areas and farmland. Please change development rules to protect nature, not developers.

Comment ID

33011

Commenting on behalf of

London Development Institute

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please accept London Development Institute(LDI) comments and suggestion regarding changes to the Development Charges Act including O.Reg. 82/98 as per Schedule 3 of Bill 108 Read more

Comment ID

33093

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am asking the government of Ontario to stop legislation known as Bill 108 or at least delay it and provide for public meetings so that citizens and even municipal politicians can understand the impacts of such a wide ranging piece of legislation. Read more

Comment ID

33140

Commenting on behalf of

City of Markham

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Attached is the City of Markham's comments on the proposed regulatory changes to the Development Charges Act, 1997. The attachment includes the Council resolution and recommendations, along with the supporting staff report. Read more

Comment ID

33144

Commenting on behalf of

Town of Wasaga Beach

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The most important deliverable for the province in Bill 108 implementation is to ensure that the intended savings through new/restricted municipal finance tools are passed down to the consumer to reduce housing prices and increase affordability. Please see the attached letter. Read more

Comment ID

33190

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Comments on behalf of the City of London regarding proposed changes to O. Reg. 82/98 under the Development Charges Act related to Schedule 3 of Bill 108, More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019. Read more