This proposal requests permission to emit noxious malodorous gases very close to a public park and housing areas. This is not an appropriate location for such a plant.
It is not appropriate to give approval to this kind of project while covid precautions prevent proper consultation.
This plant needs to be away from all residential areas. The release of harmful gases and truck transportation will destroy the Rouge park area which is central to the outdoor lives of Scarborough residents.
Read more
Appendix A of the ESDM used AERMOD calculations for emission sources from the many stacks. For three of these emission the calculations are predicted on rural settings. the Coronation Drive site is urban, not rural, with residential areas in the immediate vicinity.
Read more
For the reasons outlined in the attached letter I oppose the location of the plant close to the Lake near residential areas. It should be located in an industrial area near a 400 series highway remote from existing residential areas.
Read more
Air Quality of Scarborough is bad already and as resident we do not want to get it worse as i heard
that they are going to built a LARGE WASTE PROCESSING PLANT AND BIOGAS CREATION FACILITY at
633 CORONATION DRIVE.
Read more
As a young professional I recently moved into this neighborhood. I plan on raising my young family here. This development is concerning as it will cause unwarranted noise pollution and the bio hazard waste poses health to residents in this community.
Read more
We moved to West Hill several years ago to start a family; our children are now growing and starting to explore the many parks and green spaces that adorn the area, and the neighbourhood has grown to cater to young families.
Read more
The addition of a waste processing plant and biogas creation plant on Coronation drive, will have a negative impact on the environment and surrounding neighbourhood. The plant if created would be too close to residential areas, schools and parks, how is this safe? Or even being considered?
Read more
Unfortunately this study, (unlike the one requested by the City) only focuses on traffic patterns, and does not consider the environmental, health, noise or safety risks from the significantly increased truck traffic.
Read more
The results of the recently added Traffic Impact Study are completely predictable. The review was done by a company that was hired by Coronation Organics Processing Inc. "in support of the proposed development" (1.1).
Read more
Executive Summary:
This report will analyse the submission material that was provided by the Ministry in response to ECA requests - 019-1444/019-1446 with reference numbers 8818-BKDPE7 and 2032-BKDP63 submitted by the numbered company 2683517 Ontario Inc.
Read more
Traffic Study,
The proponent agreed to conduct a traffic study at the request of the community, and while it is appreciated, it does not take into account the significant concerns the community has with the increased traffic proposed by this facility.
Read more
Please do not inflict this toxic disaster upon us. The carbon emissions alone alone are a hazard not just to our immediate neighborhood, but to the rest of the world.
Read more
This traffic study is deeply flawed and reeks of conflict of interest. The study should be done by the province, should not cherry pick intersections, and should weigh all externalities such as noise and pollution from the large number of heavy trucks in and out of the site 24 hours a day.
Read more
This traffic study uses data from as far back as 2001 and 2011 which is useless given the changes in the neighbourhood. Truck traffic has increased since 2016, along with regular vehicle traffic since the townhouses at 280 Manse Road adjacent to the community centre.
Read more
View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.
Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.
Download comments
We strongly disagree with…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
46970
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This proposal requests…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
46979
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Hi I live in the area please…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
46980
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Hi I live in the area please…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
46981
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This plant needs to be away…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
46986
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Appendix A of the ESDM used…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
47008
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
For the reasons outlined in…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
47035
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Air Quality of Scarborough…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
47046
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
As a young professional I…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
47055
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
You indicate that a new…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
47060
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
We moved to West Hill…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
47069
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The addition of a waste…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
47087
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Unfortunately this study, …
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
47091
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The results of the recently…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
47094
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Executive Summary: This…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
47099
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
RE: Plant emissions on air…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
47103
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Traffic Study, The proponent…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
47108
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Please do not inflict this…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
47111
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This traffic study is deeply…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
47114
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This traffic study uses data…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
47117
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions