Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

66775

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It would be ridiculously stupid for the government to even touch the green belt. They already see how messed up our world is and to touch that would ruin the habitat of many animals and ruin our quality of life. Such as ruining the air we breathe, the water we drink. Read more

Comment ID

66776

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Greenbelt was protected for a reason. Look back on the reasons for protecting it. Don't lose sight of the bigger picture to make more money for large conglomerates. There has to be other solutions that are being ignored because they wouldn't bring in as much profit. DON'T BE GREEDY!! Read more

Comment ID

66781

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I do not agree with developing the Greenbelt. This is protected land that provides flood protection and a local food source to Ontarians. If we start developing parcels of the Greenbelt now, what's to stop this government from developing the entire thing in a few years? Read more

Comment ID

66782

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This initiative is corrupt and greedy. Ford only cares for this well-being and of his investors. Do not destroy the greenbelt so that the rich can become richer. It baffles me that the corrupt prefer money over the love of their people and country. Read more

Comment ID

66792

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We don’t want the green belt to be developed! Doug ford claimed he wouldn’t, and is now going back on his promises as he has done countless times before. He is repeatedly putting our tax dollars towards things we actively done want! Read more

Comment ID

66793

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These changes are intended to resolve the current criitical shortage of affordable and attainable housing that is provincewide, but does it require these developments to be high density, and attainable according to a definition that will target those families and individuals who currently are priced Read more

Comment ID

66795

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Another solution should be sought to resolve the housing shortage. Opening protected lands will have far reaching consequences that we may not see immediately but we will definitely experience in the future. Preserving green spaces is incredibly important. Read more