Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

67770

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
You’ll be destroying multiple homes of the animals that currently live on this land to replace them with mansions. Where would these animals go? First thing they’ll do is then enter towns where they’ll be unsafe and causing trouble. This land is protected for a reason. Read more

Comment ID

67771

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Your proposed changes to the Green Belt are a terrible idea for Ontario. We need to preserve the environment in light of climate change. Stop your racist reasoning that this is for immigrants, we all understand that you're doing this for all your friends who are developing the land. Read more

Comment ID

67784

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I think it is extremely shortsighted to pave and build within the green belt to further the GTA’s urban sprawl. The green belt was designated for a reason and the loss of biodiversity, nature, and farmland outweighs the need for sprawling single family homes. Read more

Comment ID

67789

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I personally and very strongly oppose the decision to develop over Green Belt land. It is a known fact that the housing crisis is not due to a lack of land. The housing crisis is a result of affordability and access. There are more vacant units than there are homeless people in Ontario. Read more

Comment ID

67792

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We have seen a significant supply chain disruptions even for food supply. It would be of national interest to preserve food security in the face of possible global supply chain disruptions with upcoming risk of further climate disruptions and possible global conflict

Comment ID

67798

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Simply reclaiming more land in place of the environmentally sensitive land is not a viable solution. More land does not equate to equal land. The land in the greenspace is ecological fragile. The wildlife there is doomed if this proposal proceeds. Read more

Comment ID

67801

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Environmental protections and sanctions do not seem to be honoured in regards to some of the stated area(s). What is your proposal for environmental protection involving water ways, animal crossings, endangered species protection and indigenous treaty consultation?