Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

70066

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I would like to express my disgust with this plan to develop the greenbelt. Ontario needs affordable housing and NOT more luxury condos. Especially when the cost exceeds finances and we lose precious ecosystems. This party is such a disappointment and a mockery of functional democracy. Read more

Comment ID

70072

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The greenbelt and surrounding areas are forever being eroded by single-family home developers reducing our environmental/climate resistance and adding to urban sprawl that is still inaccessible to many homeowners, global warming, and stunningly bad land use per square meter. Read more

Comment ID

70073

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
ENOUGH with the removal of our green space!!! This land was already previously protected and is/was the wish of the people of Ontario. What gives yourself the right, Premier Ford, to overrule the people? You are quickly turning into a fascist and the new dictator of Ontario. Read more

Comment ID

70077

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bill 23 is a terrible idea full stop. The Greenbelt should never be subtracted from, if anything it should be added to. To suggest you can take from one area and add to another is sheer lunacy. The Greenbelt needs to be continuous not fragmented. Read more

Comment ID

70082

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Instead of using green belt for extra house, government should support/or provide incentive to construct/Legalize the existing or nee basement apartments so that they can earn income from property tax, renovation business, and provides affordable living , extra income to owners and accommodate more Read more

Comment ID

70089

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The province's own Housing Affordability Task Force stated plainly earlier this year that a land shortage is not the cause of our housing crisis. The task force's report said there is enough land in existing built up areas and other undeveloped lands that are outside of the Greenbelt. Read more

Comment ID

70099

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There's no doubt that Toronto is notorious for its slow traffic and terrible housing market. However, it's also home to the Greenbelt, protected farms, green space, forests, and so much more that are invaluable to all Golden Horseshoe communities. Read more

Comment ID

70105

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Strongly disagree with the anti-democratic and anti-environmental implications of these 'proposed amendments'. The proposal carves 7,400 acres out of the Greenbelt for development - with an unfounded excuse that these lands are need for housing. Read more

Comment ID

70106

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
While I am all for housing development, I believe it is fundamentally not in the interests of Ontarians or of municipalities to further open up protected lands. Instead, densifying and redeveloping existing lands can achieve two main goals: Read more