Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

64511

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
No, do not change the green belt boundaries. Forest and river ecosystems take time to grow and develop. Simply moving the boundary back does not grow a new forest overnight. It takes years to grow something that takes minutes to destroy. Read more

Comment ID

64585

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I and many others are steadfastly against this proposal. There are other options to densify the GTA instead of add more sprawl. This will end up causing more problems and disaster issues down the road. Where are the scientific studies to show the effects of this plan?!?!?

Comment ID

64604

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
i am vehemently opposed to sacrificing protected greenbelt for the benefit of either road construction or housing. the designation was meant to give lasting conservation of land critical to the already declining health of the environment. find another way.

Comment ID

64619

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I do not support any removal of Greenbelt land for development, including housing. Urban sprawl is not the way forward to adding homes in Ontario. We need to add density and services to support that density in our cities. Read more

Comment ID

64620

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I do not support any removal of Greenbelt land for development, including housing. Urban sprawl is not the way forward to adding homes in Ontario. We need to add density and services to support that density in our cities. Read more

Comment ID

64649

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It is irresponsible to sacrifice land that is valuable to many, for luxury residences for a few. This new proposal to reduce the Greenbelt refutes the goals of - and diminishes the government's commitment to - environmental stewardship. Read more

Comment ID

64663

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
What are you doing? Why are you backtracking on Ford's election promises. We as a province, country and world cannot keep eliminating green space and agricultural space. Shameful.... Ford stated he is for the people but clearly is not!

Comment ID

64755

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Doug Ford promised not to touch the greenbelt. The situation hasn't changed, he just blatantly lied. Changing the Greenbelt will result in destruction of wetlands in addition to decreased flood prevention and decreased quality and quantity of drinking water. Read more

Comment ID

64769

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As a citizen of Ontario living in the golden horseshoe I strongly oppose the development of the greenbelt. We need the greenbelt to support our local environment, including the prevention of flooding and preservation of biodiversity. Read more

Comment ID

64772

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Urban sprawl is bad. We know this and experience across North America supports it. It's bad for the environment, bad for creating livable communities, and bad for the public purse. The proposed amendments allow for more sprawl in Ontario. Read more

Comment ID

64788

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Stop this nonsense. We all know that the people who need homes won't be able to afford the million dollar, poorly built monstrosities that you want to construct far away from any amenities! This is very clearly Ford's plan to put money into the pockets of developers. Read more

Comment ID

64819

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please do not sell out Ontarians. I know my statement may sound biased, but selling out drinking water filtration system for some businesses is short sited and flawed. Grow our transit system, allow for smoother inter city travel and facilitate multiple business hubs in Ontario. Read more

Comment ID

64868

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am absolutely opposed to the amendment and changes. This is a huge step back and backpedalling on the Ford government's promises to not touch the Greenbelt. We should not be removing parts of the Greenbelt area in order to meet housing demand. Read more