Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

67007

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am writing about my concerns with this proposal. The greenbelt is protected land that the people of Ontario have very clearly stated over and over that it was to remain protected. There was a very clear, ON CAMERA PROMISE by Premier Ford that he would NEVER touch or develop the greenbelt. Read more

Comment ID

67049

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please don't chip away at the Greenbelt. It's very much there for a reason! I like the possible areas to add to it but they don't compensate for the areas that are lost. It's not an equal trade. Please, for the love of humanity, DO NOT DO THIS.

Comment ID

67063

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is a giveway to developers and their lobbyists. The need for affordable housing should not be so shamelessly exploited as political cover. Affordable housing should be addressing the 'missing middle' housing categories - low density multi-unit housing - not sponsoring more speculative sprawl.

Comment ID

67090

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The green belt is intended to remain intact. It is not a reserve of land to be auctioned off by politicians to gain favour. It is meant for the good of future generations. For the future of our people. Our wildlife. Our green space. Our air. Our water systems. Our mental health. Hands. Off. Read more

Comment ID

67102

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The green belt is not for sale. It is not to be sold for homes. The housing issue will not be solved with these expensive and inaccessible homes. These sprawling developments taking over our precious farmland add food insecurity to our problems. Read more

Comment ID

67117

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We're in a climate crisis, we cannot afford build over conservation areas. This proposal does not help with affordability and at the same time makes significant damage to our environment. Homes belong in towns and cities, not on top of farms, forests and wetlands.

Comment ID

67248

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The science has been clear, we need to do MORE to protect the environment, not less. There is ample literature showing how biodiversity loss will effect our world in the future and it’s about time we approached our ambitions with some humility. Read more

Comment ID

67259

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am against this bill. There are many other options to build affordable housing without touching the greenbelt. These other options should be explored before considering expansion into the greenbelt. We don’t need more sprawl, with more roads, highways and the resulting traffic. Read more