Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

79470

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am completed against Bill 23. Ford stated he would not touch the Greenbelt and that needs to be honoured. If we care about the future another housing plan needs to be created that doesn’t infringe on the Greenbelt. Ecologically diverse and fertile lands need to be protected.

Comment ID

79483

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I do not support the modification of the Greenbelt as outlined in this plan due to concern for habitat loss and urban sprawl. Housing solutions to population increase should rather aim to introduce gentle density to already populated areas in suburbs and urban settings.

Comment ID

79495

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This will not create affordable housing, the costs will be downloaded to tax payers, the destruction of the green belt is unconscionable, and the environmental disasters from paving it are completely preventable by leaving it alone. Please do not do this.

Comment ID

79498

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am so oppressed to this proposal. The Greenbelt is an established protection zone for people today, future generations, wildlife and nature -- not developers. People need homes, but they should be constructed elsewhere. Read more

Comment ID

79516

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We need farmland and protected green space. Our food needs to be local. Our kids need to have clean air. I appreciate the need to address housing but you can do so by thinking innovatively and look at new sustainable housing models rather than trashing our environment. Read more

Comment ID

79517

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
1. In the face of unprecedented and accelerating biodiversity loss and the ever-worsening climate crisis, it is vital for the well-being of all Ontarians that your government do its utmost to protect the farmland, wetlands, forests, rivers and other natural areas that sustain us. Read more

Comment ID

79544

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Any changes to the boundaries in the Greenbelt should not be considered until Conservation Authority powers have been fully restored.  Conservation Authorities are not a barrier to growth -- 'Conservation Authorities Act' requires timely reviews.  Municipalities need to have expertise of C.A.'s to e Read more

Comment ID

79599

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It is essential to preserve our natural areas such as wetlands, forests and rivers to preserve biodiversity. By doing so we can take a step in protecting our environment, the air we breathe and the farmlands that ultimately feed us. Read more

Comment ID

79645

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I strongly oppose the proposal for several reasons: - the greenbelt constraint on urban land zoning is an important constraint that incentivizes thoughtful and purposeful land use in the GTA, and is necessary to combat the problem of urban sprawl Read more