Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

91132

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is ridiculous use of land we need for growing our food, and food for all the people we are bringing into Canada. We have a food crisis and California and AZ are soon unable to grow food for us as they have a water shortage. Read more

Comment ID

91133

Commenting on behalf of

City of Oshawa

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please find attached correspondence regarding City of Oshawa Report ED-23-112: City Comments on the Proposed Provincial Planning Statement and Summary of Changes Resulting from Bill 97, the “Helping Homebuyers, Protecting Tenants Act, 2023.” Read more

Comment ID

91134

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We need to be allowed more lots severed off of our farms. Please make this happen mr.Clark and mr.Ford! Our children want to stay on the farm and build their own homes!

Comment ID

91135

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I believe that taking any farm land out to allow homes is A very short sited approach. Food security for our own people in Canada is paramount over sprawling sud divisions. Densification of present residential lands is the preferred direction. Biodiversity is a crisis that needs to be addressed. Read more

Comment ID

91136

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I want to subdivide 2 lots off of our 40 acres. One for ourselves to build on and one extra one to help pay for the cost of building a new home as we are going to sell our current house to our daughter so her and her family can move back home from Alberta

Comment ID

91137

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I strongly disagree with the proposal's direction to allow the conversion farmland, prime or otherwise, into residential land. Ontario's urban centres would be much better served through densification. Read more

Comment ID

91138

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
hello, I am a member of my Township's Heritage committee, and member of the ACO. Our heritage committee is making excellent, initial progress on recommending historic and culturally valuable buildings and structures for listing and designation to our Council. Read more

Comment ID

91139

Commenting on behalf of

Town of Arnprior

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Town of Arnprior has concerns regarding 3 issues: 1. Changes to the employment land definition and requirements for conversion to non-residential lands 2. The greater role given to Ministers zoning Orders 3. Rapid implementation Read more

Comment ID

91143

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As a legally-blind person living in the Niagara peninsula, I think it's very important that the above plan prioritizes developing mixed-use zoning, dense multi-unit housing, and usable public infastructure such as busses, trains, trams, and protected bike lanes. Read more

Comment ID

91145

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Farmland is precious to Ontario. Building on farmland will reduce crops we need to feed people and animals. I am against further building on vulnerable farm land.

Comment ID

91147

Commenting on behalf of

Corporation of the Township of Wilmot

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please find attached Township of Wilmot Staff Report DS-2023-09 which forms the Township of Wilmot comment on this matter. Read more

Comment ID

91149

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
please continue to follow through on allowing farmers to sever 3 or more parcels of land from their property to increase the housing supply. This is a great idea and needs to be passed.

Comment ID

91150

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The solution to the housing crisis is not to build more suburbs (and suburbs of suburbs at this point) and create an even more car-centric culture than we already have. We need to go in the opposite direction, for the environment and for our quality of life. Read more

Comment ID

91151

Commenting on behalf of

City of Guelph

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The City of Guelph appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the adaptation of the Provincial Policy Statement (“PPS”) and A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (“the Growth Plan”) into a new proposed Provincial Planning Statement (“Planning Statement”). Read more

Comment ID

91153

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
All the policy the government did gose against housing affordability, doubling immigration every year since 2015 dose not help,and thair is no infrastructure to support all the people moving into these areas, and all the family's moving into thair new homes, will be driving every where because the l Read more

Comment ID

91154

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Doug Ford's Bill 23 ensures that our communities' past eventually truly does become history. Ford's apathy towards our built and natural heritage proves he is amenable to sacrificing it for 'More Homes Built Faster'. Read more