Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

33544

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I'm totally agreeable with the ERO proposal. Since this ERO is in regards to better moose management & harvest controls, I would also like to strongly recommend that the BGMAC committee's Moose Management Review recommendations #9 & #15 be followed.

Comment ID

33549

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am in great favour of these changes. I hope that individuals can enjoy a moose hunt every year, like the past. I read the proposal with my father, and kept reading aloud things that we have been saying/hearing time and time again. We need these changed quick Sincerely, M.P. Read more

Comment ID

33562

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
September 6, 2019 To: Whom it May Concern, MNRF Moose Policy Committee Re: Comments regarding revision of Moose Draw& Tag Allocation For the most part I will refer to the numbers for WMU 60 as it is where our hunt camp LUP is located. Read more

Comment ID

33563

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
September 6, 2019 To: Whom it May Concern, MNRF Moose Policy Committee Re: Comments regarding revision of Moose Draw& Tag Allocation For the most part I will refer to the numbers for WMU 60 as it is where our hunt camp LUP is located. Read more

Comment ID

33584

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I like the idea of having extra tags for the bow season in the WMU chosen. I think that the new proposed changes are not effectively in any way going to help increase the moose population. They sound very complicated and need to have alot of tracking making the margin for errors higher. Read more

Comment ID

33585

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The new refs proposed will destroy the well established groups/hunting party’s designed to spread the available tags in the wmu’s. Firstly close the season provincially by Nov 15 Adopt the proposed bull and cow/calf and without an automatic calf tag Read more

Comment ID

33588

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Keep the guaranteed group part of the draw as it to years to establish these partys and it will always give the individual applicant a better chance at succeeding in getting a tag for the remainder tags available. Read more

Comment ID

33591

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I believe that limiting the number of people that can hunt on a tag will negatively impact larger long established hunt camps. I camp has been established for 30 years. When it was first established in 1989 in WMU #28, we only had 8 members. Read more

Comment ID

33594

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
To: Whom it May Concern, MNRF Moose Policy Committee Re: Comments regarding revision of Moose Draw& Tag Allocation For the most part I will refer to the numbers for WMU 60 as it is where our hunt camp LUP is located. Read more

Comment ID

33597

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
My concern would be limiting 10 hunters to party hunt on one tag. As we have an established hunting group with a camp and 20 plus owners of that camp it would be difficult to choose which 10 hunters are to hunt on that tag. Read more

Comment ID

33599

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
September 6, 2019 To: Whom it May Concern, MNRF Moose Policy Committee Re: Comments regarding revision of Moose Draw& Tag Allocation For the most part I will refer to the numbers for WMU 60 as it is where our hunt camp LUP is located. Read more

Comment ID

33602

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
reduce the quota for the cow harvest the wmu i hunt in has had the cow quota doubled in the past ten years since this has started the quantity of moose seen during hunting season has declined to the point where we are surprised if we see two moose amongst the entire gang. Read more