Clublink Corporation ULC - Permit for activities to achieve an overall benefit to a species

Instrument type: Permit for activities to achieve an overall benefit to a species

ERO number
019-5569
Ministry reference number
ER-C-001-22
Notice type
Instrument
Act
Endangered Species Act , R.S.O. 2007
Posted by
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Notice stage
Decision
Decision posted
Comment period
August 25, 2022 - September 24, 2022 (30 days) Closed
Last updated

This consultation was open from:
August 25, 2022
to September 24, 2022

Decision summary

The Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks has issued an overall benefit permit to Clublink Corporation ULC for development activities that will impact Butternut. The permit includes actions to minimize adverse effects and actions to benefit the species, as well as monitoring and reporting requirements.

Location details

Site address

7000 Campeau Drive
Kanata, ON
K2T 0A3
Canada

Site location map

The location pin reflects the approximate area where environmental activity is taking place.

View this location on a map opens link in a new window

Proponent(s)

Clublink Corporation ULC
15675 Dufferin Street
King City, ON
L7B 1K5
Canada

Decision details

On May 28, 2025, the Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks issued an overall benefit permit to Clublink Corporation ULC under subsection 17(1) of the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA) concerning Butternut and its habitat. The permit enables the permit holder to redevelop the Kanata Lakes Golf and Country Club and construct a new subdivision with associated servicing infrastructure and mixed density residential units in Kanata, Ontario

The permit authorizes Clublink Corporation ULC to adversely impact:

  • up to 21 Category 2 trees and 6 Category 3 trees
  • up to 5.79 hectares of Butternut habitat

Protecting species under the Endangered Species Act

Our government is committed to protecting species at risk and providing strong environmental oversight, while working to support development opportunities in the province.

Businesses, municipalities and other proponents are expected to take steps to ensure their project avoid any adverse impacts on species at risk or their habitats. However, where avoidance is not possible, the ESA gives the Minister the discretion to authorize activiities if certain conditions can be met.

The permit includes conditions that require Clublink Corporation ULC to undertake measures that will:

  • minimize adverse effects to Butternut
  • achieve overall benefits to Butternut within a reasonable time

Actions to minimize adverse effects to species

The permit requires Clublink Corporation ULC to carry out actions to minimize adverse effects on Butternut, including:

  • engaging qualified professionals to oversee and undertake the project and conditions of the permit
  • providing awareness training for any person engaging in project activities
  • implementing an erosion and sediment control plan
  • marking Butternut trees to be retained to avoid accidentally harming or killing individuals during project activities
  • marking the edge of the tree clearing area to ensure only designated trees are removed
  • ensuring that the root harm prevention zone of retained Butternut trees is fully protected
  • ensuring that exhaust fumes from equipment are directed away from the tree canopy
  • creating and distributing homeowner awareness and education packages

Actions to achieve an overall benefit to species

The permit requires Clublink Corporation ULC to carry out actions to achieve an overall benefit for the species within a reasonable time. This includes:

  • implementing a stewardship program and distribute 394 Butternut seedlings distributed in batches of 10 to 20 seedlings to at least 20 landowners and/or Indigenous communities that have agreed to participate in the stewardship program
  • archiving 6 Butternut trees through the collection of a total of 300 scions to be grafted onto Black Walnut trees and held in the provincial archive

These actions are expected to result in the following benefits for Butternut by:

  • yielding long term conservation gains by planting seedlings in small populations to help improve distribution, genetic diversity and chances of natural reproduction
  • contributing to the provincial Butternut archive and efforts to further understand resistance to Butternut Canker

Other information

The following reasonable alternatives, including alternatives that would not adversely affect the species, were considered:

  • Alternative 1 – not proceeding with the project and avoiding all impacts to Butternut and its habitat
  • Alternative 2 – proceeding with the project by redeveloping 5.79 ha of Butternut habitat, killing 16 and harming 11 Butternut individuals
  • Alternative 3 – proceeding with the project by redeveloping 6.49 ha of Butternut habitat, killing 18 and harming 11 Butternut individuals

The best option is alternative 2, which proceeds with the project with the smaller development footprint. This meets the objective of the project to increase housing, is economically viable and technically feasible and strikes a balance with the preservation and enhancement of key habitat features and functions for Butternut.

Government response statement for Butternut

Ontario has published a government response statement (GRS) under section 12.1 of the ESA with respect to Butternut. You can access the GRS through the ministry’s website: Butternut government response statement | ontario.ca

The permit reflects the following objectives outlined in the GRSs for these species:

  • collecting and archiving genetic material from Butternut trees that may contribute to the recovery of the species
  • promoting landowner awareness
  • increasing self-sustaining populations

Comments received

Through the registry

0

By email

0

By mail

0
View comments submitted through the registry

Supporting materials

View materials in person

Some supporting materials may not be available online. If this is the case, you can request to view the materials in person.

Get in touch with the office listed below to find out if materials are available.

Species at Risk Branch
Address

40 St Clair Ave West
Toronto, ON
M4V 1M2
Canada

How to Appeal

Appeals are not allowed

This instrument type cannot be appealed. Learn more about our consultation process.

Connect with us

Contact

Todd Copeland

Phone number
Email address
Office
Species at Risk Branch - Permissions and Compliance
Address

5520 Hwy 101 East
PO Bag 3020
South Porcupine, ON
P0N 1H0
Canada

Sign up for notifications

We will send you email notifications with any updates related to this consultation. You can change your notification preferences anytime by visiting settings in your profile page.

Follow this notice

Original proposal

ERO number
019-5569
Ministry reference number
ER-C-001-22
Notice type
Instrument
Act
Endangered Species Act , R.S.O. 2007
Posted by
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Proposal posted

Comment period

August 25, 2022 - September 24, 2022 (30 days)

Proposal details

Clublink Corporation ULC has submitted an application for an overall benefit permit under clause 17(2)(c) of the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA) for impacts to Butternut to construct a new subdivision, including approximately 1,544 residential units, in Kanata, Ontario.

The proposal may adversely impact:

  • Butternut individuals
  • approximately 5.79 hectares of Butternut habitat

Protecting species under the Endangered Species Act

The Ontario government is committed to protecting species at risk and providing strong environmental oversight while working to support development opportunities in the province.

Ontario provides protections for species at risk and their habitats under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA). Sections 9 and 10 of the ESA provide protection for individual members of a species and their habitat if that species is listed on the Species at Risk in Ontario List as either:

  • extirpated
  • endangered
  • threatened

Butternut is listed on the Species at Risk in Ontario List as endangered; therefore, it is protected.

Under clause 17(2)(c) of the ESA, the Minister may issue a permit authorizing a person to engage in an activity that would otherwise be prohibited by sections 9 or 10 of the ESA if the minister believes that:

  • an overall benefit to the species will be achieved within a reasonable time through the conditions of the permit
  • reasonable alternatives have been considered, including alternatives that would not negatively affect the species, and the best alternative has been adopted
  • reasonable steps to minimize negative effects on individual members of the species are required by conditions of the permit

Providing an overall benefit to a protected species under the ESA involves improving circumstances for the species in Ontario. Overall benefit is:

  • more than “no net loss” or an exchange of “like for like”
  • grounded in the protection and recovery of the species at risk
  • must include more than mitigation measures or “replacing” what is lost

Actions to achieve an overall benefit to species

Clublink Corporation ULC is working to identify proposed actions that would achieve an overall benefit to Butternut. These may involve:

  • archiving 4 Butternut and collecting 50 scions from each tree for a total of 200 scions to be grafted onto recipient Black Walnut trees
  • working with a local stewardship program to produce and distribute 394 Butternut seedlings to be planted by landowners across Eastern Ontario

The planting of Butternut seedlings in many small populations spread out over a large geographic area is anticipated to:

  • yield long term conservation gains compared to a high-density planting in a single location
  • help improve the species success and chances of natural reproduction, distribution and genetic diversity

Reasonable alternatives being considered

Clublink Corporation ULC is considering alternatives, including alternatives that would not adversely affect Butternut and its habitat. These may include:

  • Alternative 1 - proceed with the proposed project development
  • Alternative 2 - reduce the size of the Woodland Park within the proposed project development
  • Alternative 3 - avoid all impacts to Butternut and its habitat

Clublink Corporation ULC has concluded that the best alternative is Alternative 1. This alternative:

  • will allow the project development to proceed
  • is considered economically viable and technically feasible
  • strikes a balance between meeting the servicing and development needs of the subdivision, while preserving/enhancing key habitat features and functions for Butternut

Actions to minimize adverse effects on the species

Clublink Corporation ULC is seeking ways to minimize adverse effects on Butternut and its habitat. These may include:

  • conducting contractor awareness training before starting work on the site
  • marking Butternut trees to be retained to avoid accidentally harming or killing individuals during project activities
  • marking the edge of the tree clearing area to ensure only designated trees are removed
  • ensuring that the Critical Root Zone of retained Butternut trees is fully protected
  • ensuring that exhaust fumes from all equipment are directed away from tree canopy
  • providing homeowner awareness and education packages to educate homeowners on the presence of the species

Other information

The Province has published a government response statement (GRS) under subsection 12.1 of the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA) with respect to Butternut. The GRS will be considered before a decision to issue an overall benefit permit.

Posting this proposal on the Environmental Registry of Ontario does not imply that the Minister will issue a permit. A permit may only be issued where the legal requirements set out in clause 17(2)(c) of the ESA have been satisfied.

Supporting materials

View materials in person

Some supporting materials may not be available online. If this is the case, you can request to view the materials in person.

Get in touch with the office listed below to find out if materials are available.

Permissions Section
Address

40 St. Clair Ave. West
14th Floor
Toronto, ON
M4V 1M2
Canada

Office phone number

Comment

Commenting is now closed.

This consultation was open from August 25, 2022
to September 24, 2022

Connect with us

Contact

April Mitchell

Phone number
Office
Species at Risk Branch - Land and Water Division
Address

435 James St. South
Suite 114
Thunder Bay, ON
P7E 6T1
Canada