Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

74933

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Sad to see the Greenbelt being slowly chipped away at. This was one of Doug Ford's election promises that he would not touch it. Not very democratic and the fact that developers are waiting with land already bought is suspicious. Read more

Comment ID

74943

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I strongly disagree with the proposed changes to the Greenbelt. The area was designated after widespread environment consultation and consideration. It represents important greenspace and watersheds and it is not appropriate to change this. Read more

Comment ID

74972

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We need to protect and grow the green belt. And we don’t need more cul-de-sacs and highways, we need affordable, environmentally sound housing supported by mass transit. There seems to be a total denial of climate change within this government.

Comment ID

74974

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This Bill must not pass. It favours the wrong kind of development. I see land all around me that could be put to better use. Homeowners on suburban plots can be part of densification that communities need economically while supporting construction, good jobs and building healthy local economies. Read more

Comment ID

75101

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I would not like to see any protected area be redesignated. These areas are protected for a reason. This is a very slippery slope and undermines the integrity of government promises. Who will protect these green spaces for our future generations.

Comment ID

75131

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The provincial Government needs to encourage the construction of more affordable homes and rental units in the province; however It is vital for our future that it does so in an environmentally sustainable way not only in terms of construction methods but very importantly in terms of where Read more

Comment ID

75133

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I strongly disagree with the proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation. The Greenbelt is intended to be permanently protected land. If we start chipping away at it, it will open the door for future reductions to this important space. Read more

Comment ID

75139

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There are obviously monetary reasons for developers to target beautiful natural spaces to build one family dwellings with lawns and driveways and roads, services, and the usual use of chemicals involved in suburban housing. Planting invasive species destroy habitats near developments. Read more

Comment ID

75155

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I feel that it is vitally important to protect Ontario's greenbelt as it currently exists for the well-being and enjoyment of this and future generations. Greenbelt lands should not be used for housing or other developments. Read more