Humphries Planning Group Inc. (HPGI) represents 100032319 Ontario Inc., the registered owner of the property located at 11840 Keele Street in the City of Vaughan (the “Subject Property”).
Read more
We are staring down the barrel of a climate crisis that will not only damage infrastructure but also future generations. I feel building on the Greenbelt would be a huge misstep that does not put Ontarians first in the slightest.
Read more
The housing commission has found there is sufficient land available within curent urban boundaries. Stay in your lane and focus on fixing this province and stay out of the development business 9
I am opposed to bill 23. The annexation and development of the greenbelt should not be attempted. Doug Ford made it clear that it would not be touched.
Why are we touching the Greenbelt? The Housing Commission has found that we do not need to expand our urban boundaries to create the 1.5 million homes that we are told we need. This appears to be benefiting developers at the expense of our wetlands and protected areas.
Read more
I do not think that any land in the greenbelt should be developed. The conservation authority has advised against it. Many experts do not think it is a good idea. That the area will be more likely to flood, as others have done in the gta. The farmland in the area is something we should not lose.
Read more
I am horrified that premier Ford who had promised not to touch the greenbelt has now decided it can be developed. It is extremely concerning that a few developers have purchased greenbelt land in the past few years, which is now being removed from the greenbelt for development.
Read more
The Doug ford Gov't needs to immediately stop with this idea that they have a mandate or even are able to change the status of protected land in the greenbelt and use it for housing, or anything else outside the scope of the previous agreement, and recent promise not to.
Read more
Lands should not be removed from the Greenbelt. It was thoughtfully designed as part of a planning process. It protects important Agricultural lands and watersheds. This is critical to environmental stability and food security.
Read more
No to removing any land from the greenbelt when we are facing a climate emergency. There are other places to put affordable housing. This government's promises to replace it are obviously empty and do not impact my perspective.
Read more
This proposal is completely irresponsible at all levels of government. The environment protections should not be sacrificed for housing, commercial, retail development. This is our responsibility to protect. Canada is big enough - build somewhere else. There should be a referendum on this.
Read more
This government presents as being oblivious to science, social issues and how to sustain life for human kind. I don't believe reading is part of any preparation for decision making.
Read more
I am heartbroken and disheartened by this proposed bill and the destruction of a significant portion of the Greenbelt. There is adequate land zoned for housing to build the proposed units without impacting the Greenbelt land.
Read more
The proposed changes to the Greenbelt must not go ahead. The Greenbelt was protected for the good of all Ontarians, and removing those protections to build homes only the wealthiest can afford stands in direct opposition to that public good.
Read more
We have farms in the greenbelt and some not. A lot of the farms excluded when the greenbelt was first laid out(2005?), Came down to who the owners were.Our opinion is with how much good farmland is being paved over this government will never get my support again!
Read more
View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.
Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.
Download comments
Humphries Planning Group Inc…
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
Comment ID
77284
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
We are staring down the…
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
Comment ID
77294
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The housing commission has…
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
Comment ID
77297
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am opposed to bill 23. The…
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
Comment ID
77298
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Why are we touching the…
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
Comment ID
77300
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Please dont do this…
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
Comment ID
77303
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This is ridiculous. More…
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
Comment ID
77304
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I do not think that any land…
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
Comment ID
77312
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The green belt needs to be…
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
Comment ID
77314
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am horrified that premier…
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
Comment ID
77316
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The Doug ford Gov't needs to…
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
Comment ID
77323
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am completely opposed to…
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
Comment ID
77326
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Lands should not be removed…
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
Comment ID
77332
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
No to removing any land from…
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
Comment ID
77337
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This proposal is completely…
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
Comment ID
77343
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The Premier lied when he…
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
Comment ID
77344
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This government presents as…
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
Comment ID
77346
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am heartbroken and…
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
Comment ID
77347
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The proposed changes to the…
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
Comment ID
77348
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
We have farms in the…
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
Comment ID
77350
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions