Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

84039

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There is NO need to expand development onto Greenbelt lands. Get your heads out of your posterior and see , and read what is going on in the world !! Read more

Comment ID

84060

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
many residential communities in Durham have large properties. We want to subdivide our land so others can also enjoy living in a rural community. Current Durham policy states that parcels of 100 acres can only be subdivided. Read more

Comment ID

84063

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Proposed Provincial Planning Statement wording change: 4.3.3 Lot Creation and Lot Adjustments 1. Residential lot creation in prime agricultural areas is only permitted in accordance with provincial guidance for: Read more

Comment ID

84067

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I live in Woodslee in Southwestern Ontario. I am writing this comment with the hope that the province can give municipalities more flexibilty when it comes to in fill lots in the rural area. In my situation we have a double lot 300 feet by 300 feet. Read more

Comment ID

84074

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We all understand the housing shortage and the need to get more built as quickly as possible With subdivisions being built to make our city's and towns larger In doing so Rural property owners can not get severances of their property even if the property Read more

Comment ID

84078

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Ontario's latest housing plan encourages sprawl, which will be disastrous for our communities and province. This plan will take away irreplaceable natural habitats for flora/fauna and important flood absorption sites. Read more

Comment ID

84084

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These proposed changes are unnecessary. This is a land grab intended to promote unsustainable development in order to benefit the Premier's developer friends. Read more

Comment ID

84086

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It is beyond belief that the provincial government would blow up the Growth Plan for the GGH. Your job is to manage the province in a way that protects the health and welfare of the people. Controlling growth and protecting the agricultural system and the natural heritage system are fundamental. Read more

Comment ID

84090

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The proposed changes to the PPS undermine the public's interest in preserving resources for future populations, specifically: our limited prime agricultural land; heritage areas; employment areas; and environmental sustainability. Read more

Comment ID

84091

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Would be nice to have some incentives available, such as government grants, to implement Laneway Houses (additional dwelling units within the lot). Read more

Comment ID

84098

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We need more housing in rural areas. Uxbridge and the surrounding areas have alot of housing poverty. Alot of wealthy people are moving to rural communities. We need to open up rural residential areas to be able to subdivide. Read more

Comment ID

84100

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please do not approve this, food prices, ecosystems, flood, the constituents that you are supposed to protect are being violated on behalf of private interests, we will be the ones paying higher property taxes, higher food prices and taking the risk of floods. I do not support this Bill.

Comment ID

84101

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
On behalf of the Council for the Municipality of Dutton Dunwich, the proposed policy 4.3.3 Lot Creation and Lot Adjustments are supported. Please see attached Council resolution 2023.07.35 dated March 8, 2023. Read more

Comment ID

84107

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Give it a rest. Curb the greed. The last thing that Ontario needs is further development. Put $$ towards useless land/already developed land (GM site in St Catharines). Read more

Comment ID

84118

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This policy will not help people looking for homes or address the costs of living and housing, but instead further the neverending sprawl that southern Ontario has become infested with over the decades while undermining local communities and further increasing environmental impacts both direct and i Read more

Comment ID

84120

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I can name countless streets in Niagara where Municipalities install sewers where only one side of the street can tie in due to the other side of the same street being outside of the Urban Boundary. Read more

Comment ID

84121

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
My concerns are that the policy is ignoring the existing properties and lands that exist within cities, as well as opportunities to increase the density of core areas, which already have existing transit and other infrastructure. Read more