Subject: Reconsideration of…

Subject: Reconsideration of Bike Lane Removal: Conservative Perspective on Policy and Political Implications

Dear Minister,

I am writing to express my concern regarding the recent decision to remove bike lanes in Ontario. I am a suburban 905-Conserative voter. I recognize the importance of prudent government spending and maintaining infrastructure that supports Ontario’s economic growth. However, I believe this decision, while perhaps intended to streamline traffic flow and address immediate road maintenance concerns, may lead to unintended, long-term political and financial consequences.

Embarassingly, the "1.2% of people who bike" statistic is brutally wrong and is on the brink of misinformation, and this error is making humiliating waves across social media.

Firstly, removing bike lanes risks alienating a significant portion of Ontario’s urban and suburban populations who view bike lanes as vital for safe and environmentally conscious transportation. Urban and suburban centers across Canada and globally have increasingly recognized that dedicated cycling infrastructure is not just a trend but a sustainable solution that can alleviate traffic congestion, improve public health, and attract businesses that prioritize sustainable practices. Dismantling this infrastructure may weaken Ontario’s competitiveness, particularly in urban areas with younger, environmentally aware residents who prioritize such investments. This is a liberal-moderate standpoint at present, but in years time, you and I both know this will be valued among our youngest conservatives.

From a political perspective, this decision could be counterproductive in expanding our voter base. As you may know, younger, environmentally conscious voters are increasingly becoming a crucial demographic, and many are drawn to political parties that advocate for sustainable and green policies. A 2022 poll by the Canadian Urban Institute found that nearly 65% of Ontarians under 40 consider bike lanes and pedestrian-friendly policies a priority in deciding their vote. This move risks alienating not only younger voters but also moderate conservatives and families who support a balanced approach to infrastructure that includes active transportation.

Failing to adapt to these trends may hinder our party’s ability to expand beyond its traditional voter base, particularly in urban centers. This could pose a challenge in future elections as other parties step in to champion policies supporting Conservative standpoints such as allowing people to live within their financial means, freedom of movement, freedom of choice, less red tape, further widening their appeal among these groups.

I don't want the Liberals/NDP to win, and I don't want the PCs to lose voter favorability over time. I am worried what this decision may mean for the next election.

Thank you for considering this perspective. I hope we can find a way forward that strengthens our support without compromising on responsible infrastructure.