Comment
Subject: Concerns Regarding the Proposed Infrastructure Bill
I am writing to express concerns about the proposed infrastructure bill, particularly its focus on highway expansion in Ontario. While aimed at reducing congestion, expanding highways is an ineffective long-term solution, often leading to induced demand that results in more traffic. Instead, Ontario should prioritize reliable, efficient public transportation.
Highway Expansion’s Limitations: History shows that increasing road capacity only temporarily eases congestion, often worsening it over time. Public transit investment offers a sustainable solution, providing efficient alternatives to driving.
Need for Cycling Infrastructure: Expanding cycling lanes in urban areas like Toronto promotes safety, health, and reduces traffic. Banning street parking on major streets and introducing congestion charges, as seen in London (UK), could reduce congestion and generate revenue for public transit. Relying on cars limits urban mobility and increases pollution.
Property Rights Concerns: The proposed amendments to the Building Broadband Faster Act allow land expropriation without sufficient safeguards, potentially infringing on property rights. Infrastructure development must respect these rights.
Environmental Protections: Exemptions from the Environmental Assessment Act are concerning. Protecting our natural environment is essential, and thorough environmental assessments ensure responsible infrastructure development.
In conclusion, I urge reconsideration of this bill's direction. Instead of highway expansion, we should invest in sustainable transportation, prioritize community well-being, respect property rights, and uphold environmental protections.
Thank you for considering my perspective on this important issue.
Supporting links
Submitted November 13, 2024 5:52 PM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 – Building Highways Faster Act , 2024
ERO number
019-9265
Comment ID
115431
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status