Opposing Ontario's Bill 212…

Opposing Ontario's Bill 212 is essential, especially when we consider the significant role bike lanes play in Toronto's daily life. Here’s why this bill is a step in the wrong direction:

High Use of Bike Lanes
In Toronto, bike lanes are not just a luxury; they are a vital part of the transportation network. Many residents rely on biking for their daily activities—commuting to work, running errands, or simply enjoying the city. Removing these lanes would disrupt the routines of countless cyclists who depend on safe routes to navigate the streets. Studies show that bike lanes encourage more people to cycle, promoting healthier lifestyles and reducing traffic congestion.

Increased Risk of Deaths
Bill 212 poses a serious threat to safety. By eliminating bike lanes, we risk increasing the number of accidents involving cyclists and pedestrians. In 2024 alone, Toronto has seen multiple cyclist fatalities, highlighting the dangers of inadequate cycling infrastructure. Without dedicated lanes, cyclists are forced to share space with motor vehicles, leading to a higher likelihood of collisions and, tragically, deaths.

Impact on Small Businesses
The removal of bike lanes could also hurt local businesses. Many small shops and cafes benefit from the foot traffic that bike lanes generate. Cyclists often stop to shop or grab a bite, contributing to the local economy. If bike lanes are taken away, we could see a decline in customers, which would be detrimental to these businesses already struggling in a competitive market.

Worsening Traffic and Gridlock
Finally, let’s talk about traffic. Bill 212 is touted as a solution to gridlock, but history shows that adding more lanes for cars often leads to more congestion. With fewer bike lanes, more people will revert to driving, exacerbating traffic issues. This creates a vicious cycle: more cars lead to more congestion, which leads to calls for even more road expansions—none of which effectively solve the problem.

Conclusion
In summary, Bill 212 threatens the safety of cyclists and pedestrians, jeopardizes small businesses, and will likely worsen traffic congestion. Instead of removing bike lanes, we should be investing in safer, more efficient infrastructure that supports all modes of transportation. Let’s advocate for a city that prioritizes safety, accessibility, and economic vitality for everyone.