Comment
Opposing Ontario's Bill 212 is crucial, especially when you consider the troubling parallels to the Greenbelt scandal. This bill seems to be another instance where the interests of Doug Ford's friends and donors take precedence over the needs of everyday Ontarians.
Kickbacks and Conflicts of Interest
Just like the Greenbelt debacle, where developers with close ties to the Ford government stood to gain billions, Bill 212 raises serious concerns about favoritism. The bill is being framed as a solution to congestion, but many see it as a way to benefit a select group of wealthy insiders. It’s hard not to wonder: who really stands to gain from these changes?
Lack of Transparency
The Greenbelt scandal revealed a lack of transparency in decision-making, with processes bypassed to favor certain developers. Bill 212 appears to follow the same playbook. When decisions are made behind closed doors, it breeds distrust. Ontarians deserve to know how these policies are crafted and who is influencing them.
Financial Implications
The financial implications of Bill 212 could mirror those of the Greenbelt land removals, where taxpayers might end up footing the bill for decisions that primarily benefit a few. If this bill leads to costly infrastructure changes or legal battles, it’s the public that will bear the burden, while the well-connected profit.
Conclusion
In summary, Bill 212 is not just about traffic—it’s about accountability and fairness. We need to ensure that our government prioritizes the needs of all citizens, not just a privileged few. Let’s learn from the mistakes of the past and demand transparency and integrity in our legislative processes. What do you think? How can we push for better governance?
Submitted November 16, 2024 9:21 AM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 – Building Highways Faster Act , 2024
ERO number
019-9265
Comment ID
116227
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status