As non-cyclist invested in…

ERO number

019-9266

Comment ID

121069

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses

Comment

As non-cyclist invested in efficient, varied & safe transportation options living in Toronto, I strongly object to Bill 212. Bike lanes are essential for the daily commute of many, allowing people to navigate through traffic safely, while reducing pollution as well as congestion on public transportation and other forms of travel.

Removing bike lanes would force cyclists in front of cars taking up the whole lane (as is their right) which slows everything down, increasing the risk of accidents and pushing other cyclists back into cars, which would only exacerbate traffic and emissions.

In contrast, the city's existing bike lanes on streets like University, College, Yonge, and Bloor-Danforth have shown their value in supporting safe and efficient commuting.

Instead of wasting time & money dismantling these infrastructures, I believe the government should prioritize investing in public infrastructure that supports an array of transportation types to create a healthier, greener, and less congested city.

Removal of the bike lanes incentivizes the addition of cars to the roads which only marginally decreases gridlock for them while making travel harder for everyone else.

Stop Bill 212.