Comment
I vehemently oppose the changes to species at risk protections proposed within the Species Conservation Act. The changes to habitat definitions do not align with scientific data nor the ecology of the animals this act proports to protect. These changes, as well as the removal of protections against harassment and the new permitting process, will create scenarios where species will be unable to resist expiration. Furthermore, giving the government the ability to unilaterally remove species from the at risk list, and the ability to create Special Economic Zones where regulations can be ignored, injects unhelpful politics into the discussion and undermines the process and the rule-of-law as a whole.
Reverse the removal of aquatic and bird species, and do not remove SC species from the SARO list. Once again, science is the key to preserving these important parts of our natural heritage, and this is so anti-science it is embarrassing. Stop allowing your developer buddies to destroy everything that makes this province a decent place to live. These outright attacks on nature and the environment have to stop.
Submitted October 1, 2025 3:29 PM
Comment on
Developing guidance on section 16 activities under the Species Conservation Act, 2025.
ERO number
025-0908
Comment ID
158003
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status