Comment
We object to the replacement of the ESA with the weaker SCA and recommend the following:
1. Apply a robust, science, evidence-based approach to defining habitat, as was done under ESA prior to the passing of Bill 5
2. Reduce reliance on discretionary powers related to listing, and avoid exemptions to habitat protections
3. Ensure a listing and recovery approach, based on science and Indigenous knowledge to protect biodiversity, species at risk as opposed to making it easy for development
Submitted November 4, 2025 10:47 AM
Comment on
Developing guidance on section 16 activities under the Species Conservation Act, 2025.
ERO number
025-0908
Comment ID
159592
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status