Comment
Please consider these recommendations I feel are necessary to safeguard and advance the protection of species at risk, their habitats and the public’s right to participate in environmentally significant decisions.
Recommendations:
1) The text of the proposed materials must be made available for review. The 45-day comment periods for the proposals must be restarted once sufficient information (i.e. the text of the proposed regulations, amendments and guidelines) is publicly accessible and available online, to enable the public to meaningfully engage, thoroughly review, and provide informed comments (in compliance with the EBR). The proposals in their current state do not contain sufficient information to understand their far-reaching and significant implications.
2) The public’s right to participate in environmentally significant decisions must be upheld. Decisions made under the SCA, specifically regarding permits and orders, must be subject to Part II of the EBR (Public Participation in Government Decision-Making), so that the public continues to have the right to have a say before the government makes environmentally significant decisions.
3) The proposed regulations, amendments and guidelines must increase protection of species at risk and their habitats.
4) The proposed regulations, amendments and guidelines must uphold Indigenous rights. The proposed materials, and the SCA more broadly, threatens the health and survival of culturally important species, directly impacting Indigenous people’s inherent rights and constitutionally protected Treaty rights to hunt, fish and trap.
5) The definition of ‘habitat’ must be strengthened if Ontario is to protect species and their habitats from adverse impacts.
Submitted November 10, 2025 1:51 PM
Comment on
Developing guidance on section 16 activities under the Species Conservation Act, 2025.
ERO number
025-0908
Comment ID
170477
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status