Subject: Concerns Regarding…

Subject: Concerns Regarding the Proposed Merger of Conservation Authorities

I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed merger of conservation authorities in Ontario. After reviewing the details of the plan, I believe this merger is not in the best interest of our communities, environment, or conservation efforts. Below, I have outlined several reasons why this proposal should be reconsidered:

1. Lack of Evidence Supporting the Need for a Merger The Province of Ontario has not provided sufficient evidence to justify why this merger is necessary. While the plan mentions addressing inefficiencies and streamlining permit approvals, it fails to identify specific shortcomings in the current system. Issues such as inconsistent service or outdated systems can be resolved without restructuring the entire conservation framework.

2. Loss of Local Decision-Making Currently, municipalities like Hamilton and Puslinch fund a significant portion of the Hamilton Conservation Authority’s (HCA) work and have a direct say in watershed decisions. Under the proposed merger, local voices will be diluted in a larger, 28-municipality organization, even though municipalities will continue to fund the work. This undermines the ability of local communities to influence decisions that directly impact them.

3. Unclear Funding Plan for Merger Costs Merging conservation lands, visitor services, memberships, staff structures, and IT systems will be a costly and complex process. The Province has not provided a clear funding plan or explained how these costs will be covered. Furthermore, there is no evidence to suggest that combining systems will result in long-term savings.

4. HCA’s Proven Efficiency and Reliability The HCA has consistently demonstrated its ability to provide efficient and reliable service. In 2024, 94% of major permits were processed on time, meeting or exceeding provincial expectations. Instead of reorganizing authorities that are already performing well, efforts should focus on improving resources where needed.

5. Importance of Local Relationships in Conservation For over six decades, HCA has built strong partnerships with municipalities, community groups, landowners, volunteers, foundations, and Indigenous partners. These relationships are vital to effective conservation efforts. A larger, centralized agency risks eroding the local collaboration that has been key to HCA’s success.

6. Uncertainty Surrounding Key Details The proposed merger lacks clarity on critical aspects such as governance, costs, timing, staffing, land management, branding, and community impact. Without these details, it is impossible to fully understand the implications of the merger or assess its feasibility.
In conclusion, the proposed merger raises significant concerns regarding its necessity, cost, impact on local decision-making, and the potential erosion of effective conservation practices. I urge the government to reconsider this plan and focus on addressing specific inefficiencies within the current system rather than pursuing a costly and uncertain restructuring.

Thank you for considering my concerns. I hope the government will prioritize the interests of local communities and the environment in its decision-making process.

Sincerely,