There is enough evidence (or…

There is enough evidence (or lack of in many cases) to show that this application is not environmentally compliant enough to be approved. Over a dozen at risk endangered species which the impacts against havent been properly analyzed, combined with high likelihood of neglect by the skihill, considering a long history of environmental offenses specifically related to wastewater and water contamination issues. Consider all this along with the historical and continued lack of respect the ski hill management and employees have had of not only environmental concerns but also labour rights and simple workplace safety laws, should give considerable concern to all parties involved.

Do not let rich, foreign investors choose the cheapest, easiest, most toxic, harmful, least likely to reliably work option when other, better, marginally more expensive methods (such as closed loop methane digester on site storage and processing with 100% recycling of all water and solids kept on site) are available.