Comment
~{-(fG CAMBRIDGE tt'salt righthere
June 15, 2017
Cindy Tan
Manager
Ontario Growth Secretariat
Ministry of Municipal Affairs
777 Bay Street
Toronto, ON
M5G 2E5
Development and Infrastructure
The City of Cambridge
50 Dickson Street, P.O. Box 669
Cambridge ON N1 R 5W8
Tel: (519) 621-0740ext 4571
Fax: (519)621 6184
TTY: 519-623-6691
brunnshawe@cambridge.ca
Re: EBR No. 013-0426 (Transitional Matters - Growth Plans Regulation 311/06)
Dear Ms. Tan
City of Cambridge staff has reviewed the transition regulation 311/06 on the Growth
Plan Transitional Provisions posted on the Environmental Registry website (EBR
Registry Number: 013-0426).
Firstly, the City of Cambridge has been working diligently, with the assistance of an
outside planning consultant, to prepare a comprehensive Growth and Intensification
Study. This project will identify how and where Cambridge can achieve the
intensification targets in the current Growth Plan and develop a series of secondary
plans to implement the Growth Plan directions in our three downtown areas and along
major transit routes. While this work is nearing completion it will not be dealt with by
Cambridge Council before July 1, 2017, when the Growth Plan 2017 takes effect.
Secondly, after extensive commercial analysis the City of Cambridge adopted an
amendment to its Official Plan (OPA No. 17) to revise the commercial policies, including facilitating additional high density mixed-use developments on major transit corridors.
This adopted official plan amendment is still awaiting approval by the Region of
Waterloo, which is not expected prior to July 1, 2017.
Based upon our understanding of Regulation 311/06, projects such as the ones
described above would be subject to the 2017 Growth Plan, if final decisions are not
issued by July 1, 2017. I would respectfully request that amendments to a local official
plan, which have been adopted but not yet approved, should still be subject to the
Growth Plan 2006 provisions. Adoption of an official plan amendment by a local council
represents a "decision", even if further approval and possible modification is needed by the approval authority in a two tier municipality.
In addition major studies, which involve a significant outlay of municipal financial, staff
and consulting resources and public consultation, that are substantially complete,
should be allowed to proceed based on the Growth Plan 2006. Otherwise a significant
amount of additional work, resources and follow up public consultation will be necessary
to ensure compliance with the Growth Plan 2017. This will result in substantial delays in completing this project, which is designed to achieve the Provincial growth management
goals.
I would be pleased to discuss this matter with you further, should you have any
questions.
Elaine Brunn Shaw MCIP, RPP
City Planner
[Original Comment ID: 209705]
Submitted February 12, 2018 3:22 PM
Comment on
Modifications to O. Reg. 311/06 (Transitional Matters - Growth Plans) made under the Places to Grow Act, 2005 (part of the Co-ordinated Land Use Planning Review)
ERO number
013-0426
Comment ID
1918
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status